Labour MPs Push for Gambling Reform

Labour's High-Stakes Gamble: Insiders Demand Radical Overhaul of UK Betting Laws

A formidable rebellion is gathering momentum within the Labour party. A significant and expanding faction of its backbench Members of Parliament is forcefully demanding a wholesale, radical transformation of the United Kingdom's laws on gambling. This internal insurgency creates the potential for a significant confrontation between the party’s grassroots and its leadership. The movement places Keir Starmer on a difficult path relative to some of the party’s most substantial financial contributors in the wagering sector. These MPs are driven by a profound concern that ministers will not take the decisive action needed to regulate an industry which collected an unprecedented £11.5 billion from UK customers in the previous year.

A Law Unfit for the Digital Age

At the core of the reformist agenda is a widely held belief that the foundational law governing British gambling is fundamentally obsolete. The 2005 Gambling Act, introduced under Tony Blair's government, was conceived in an era before smartphones and the widespread availability of high-speed internet. Critics argue this legislation is completely inadequate for the modern digital landscape, where online betting is accessible 24 hours a day. The act's core principles, they contend, fail to address the complexities and dangers of an industry that has undergone a radical technological transformation, leaving consumers exposed to unprecedented risks.

The Rising Tide of Gambling Harm

The push for legislative change is fuelled by alarming statistics that paint a grim picture of gambling's impact on the nation. Reform advocates stress that this is a burgeoning public health crisis, with projections indicating that in Great Britain, more than a million individuals may have a gambling compulsion. This is not merely a financial issue; it is linked to severe mental health problems, family breakdown, and, in the most tragic cases, suicide. The sheer scale of the harm necessitates a fundamental rethink of the government's approach to the industry, shifting its classification from a leisure framework to that of a public health priority.

A New Generation Demands Action

Prominently featured among those advocating for a more stringent approach are MPs who first entered parliament in the 2024 general election. This new cohort, unburdened by established connections to the betting sector, is bringing fresh urgency to the debate. They are channeling their efforts through a cross-party body, the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Gambling Reform, which has become a focal point for the campaign. These newer members are vocal about wanting a regulatory system that prioritises the well-being of vulnerable people over corporate profits.

A Cross-Party Call for Change

The cross-party campaign for reform is notable. The Conservative stalwart Iain Duncan Smith, a long-time advocate for tighter controls on the wagering sector, chairs the APPG on Gambling Reform. This alliance between traditional political opponents underscores the growing consensus in Westminster that the status quo is untenable. The group features a diverse collection of MPs from different parties, all united by the conviction that the social costs of gambling harm demand a robust and unified political response.

Image Credit - Freepik

An Inquiry to Shape the Future

A major investigation into the future of wagering laws in Great Britain has been initiated by the APPG on Gambling Reform. This investigation will scrutinise the effectiveness of the current legal framework, assess the progress made since the government's 2023 white paper, and consider if a completely fresh legislative act for gambling is necessary to protect consumers in the digital age. The inquiry is actively soliciting evidence from a wide range of stakeholders, including industry operators, public health experts, academics, and individuals who have experienced gambling-related harm firsthand. Submissions are open until September 2025.

Reclassifying Gambling as a Health Issue

A central and transformative proposal from the reformist camp is to shift the oversight for betting policy. They advocate transferring it from the DCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport) to the Department of Health. Such a move would represent a monumental paradigm shift, officially reframing gambling not as a leisure or entertainment activity, but as a matter of public wellbeing. Proponents argue this would ensure that policy decisions are driven by public health considerations and scientific evidence, much like the approach taken with tobacco and alcohol.

Confronting the Advertising Barrage

A key concern for the reform-minded MPs is the sheer volume and pervasive nature of betting promotions. They argue that the relentless marketing normalises wagering, particularly for young people and sports fans. The APPG has highlighted the inadequacy of the government's proposals on promotions in the white paper, pointing to extensive evidence linking advertising exposure to an increased risk of harm. The group is pushing for a comprehensive ban on such advertising, especially advertisements directed at young people and those that associate betting with sporting success.

Safeguarding Sport's Integrity

The deep integration of betting promotions within sports is a specific point of contention. Promotions that downplay the addictive nature of betting products have become commonplace, leading to calls for stricter controls. Beccy Cooper, a new Labour MP, has explicitly made comparisons to the cigarette industry, arguing that sports marketing must be reined in for the public's protection. The ultimate goal for many reformers is to sever the close association between sport and betting, which they believe has exposed countless fans to a harmful and addictive product.

Empowering Local Communities

Beyond national legislation, there is a strong push to empower local authorities. Veteran political figures like Andy Burnham, who is Greater Manchester's mayor, is supporting a drive to give local councils more authority to prevent the expansion of betting shops and around-the-clock venues with slot machines. The current "aim to permit" policy often leaves councils powerless to reject licensing applications, even when they believe a new gambling establishment would be detrimental to the community's welfare. Reformers want to give communities a real say in the makeup of their high streets.

Image Credit - Freepik

A Six-Point Plan for Local Control

A coalition of 35 local councils, representing over 12 million people, has put forward a detailed six-point plan for change. This initiative, endorsed by the gambling reform APPG, calls for significant changes to grant councils greater power. The demands include reforming the 'aim to permit' policy, creating new categories for gambling premises to stop venues from bypassing caps, and allowing local debt levels to be considered in planning applications. They argue these measures are essential to protect vulnerable residents and prevent the saturation of high streets with gambling venues.

Banning the Most Addictive Products

The influential Fabian Society, a socialist thinktank with deep roots in Labour's history, has added its voice to the chorus for reform. It issued a publication that urges a complete ban on some of the most habit-forming betting products. This targets the highly profitable and controversial digital slot machine games, which are designed to be intensely immersive and can lead to rapid and substantial losses. The proposal reflects a growing belief that certain products are so inherently dangerous that stricter regulation is insufficient and only prohibition will suffice.

Leadership's Complicated Position

The wave of backing for far-reaching reforms presents a complex challenge for the Labour leadership. While the party's 2024 manifesto included a pledge to lessen harm related to gambling, the specific demands of the backbench group go much further than the leadership has publicly endorsed. This creates a delicate balancing act for Keir Starmer and his shadow chancellor, Rachel Reeves, as they navigate the pressure from their own MPs while considering the party's broader strategic and financial relationships.

The Influence of Industry Donations

The situation is further complicated by the Labour party's established financial connections with the betting sector. In the four years preceding the 2024 election, the party accepted contributions valued at over £400,000 from wagering firms. Both Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have personally accepted contributions from major industry players like Bet365. These financial connections create a perception of a potential conflict of interest, with some MPs concerned that such ties could soften the party's resolve to implement tough regulations.

The Westminster-Betting Nexus

The close relationship between Westminster and the gambling sector extends beyond donations. Several senior Labour figures are known to be close to Michael Dugher, a former Labour MP who now serves as the chair of the wagering industry's council. Additionally, Tom Watson, who was formerly the party's deputy leader, accepted a position advising Flutter, which is the parent company for Paddy Power and SkyBet, following his exit from politics. This "revolving door" fosters skepticism among backbenchers about the leadership's commitment to wholesale reform.

Industry Pushes Back

The betting sector, primarily through its main council, has actively engaged with the reform process. While publicly welcoming some measures, the industry generally advocates for a focus on "safer gambling" and targeted interventions rather than broad, sweeping changes. They often highlight their economic contributions and warn that excessively strict regulations could inadvertently drive customers towards unregulated black-market operators, where consumer protections are non-existent. Their position is that collaboration, not confrontation, is the key to reducing harm.

Government's Incremental Steps

The current government has initiated some reforms based on its 2023 white paper, describing them as the "first steps" in strengthening legislation. Key measures include instituting a limit on wagers for digital slot machines, setting the cap at £5 for adults over 25 and a lower £2 for those aged 18 to 24. This was a significant intervention aimed at curbing the potential for rapid losses on what are considered highly intensive products.

Image Credit - Freepik

A New Statutory Levy

Another major policy change has been the introduction of a new compulsory charge on betting businesses. This measure replaces a previous voluntary system, which was widely criticized for being inadequate and for allowing some operators to contribute as little as £1 per year. The new mandatory levy is expected to generate £100 million annually. This funding is earmarked for research, prevention, and treatment of gambling harm, with a significant portion directed towards NHS services.

Debating the Levy's Impact

While the statutory levy is seen as a positive step, there is ongoing debate about its sufficiency and structure. The £100 million raised will be distributed, with 50% going to NHS England and devolved health bodies, 30% to prevention initiatives, and 20% to research programs. However, critics question whether this amount is adequate to address the scale of the problem. There are also concerns about ensuring the funding supports practical, front-line initiatives and is not solely confined to academic research.

Unfinished Business from the White Paper

Despite the progress, reformers argue that the administration has lagged in acting on other critical proposals from the white paper. A key area of concern is the implementation of so-called "affordability checks." The plan involves frictionless financial risk assessments for customers who reach certain deposit thresholds, a measure intended to prevent people from betting more than they can afford. The Gambling Commission has been conducting pilots, which showed that most checks can be done without disrupting the customer experience.

The Path Forward

The battle over the future of wagering laws in the UK is set to intensify. The APPG's inquiry will provide a crucial evidence base for reformers, while the industry will continue to advocate for a more measured approach. The Labour leadership finds itself at a crossroads, caught between a vocal backbench and its established industry ties. The coming months will determine whether the UK will undertake a fundamental rewrite of its gambling laws or continue with a more piecemeal approach to reform.