Truman Carrier Red Sea Jet Loss

Maritime Mishaps: US Naval Aviation Confronts Challenges in Contested Waters

Another sophisticated American combat plane has plunged into the depths. The Red Sea became the watery grave for this aircraft, marking the second such event involving the naval vessel USS Harry S. Truman within a brief span. This series of unfortunate occurrences, which includes an instance of errant friendly fire, underscores the demanding operational pace and the fundamental risks naval aviators encounter in a turbulent global zone. Authorities from the United States acknowledged these regrettable episodes. The situation calls for a detailed review of existing protocols and machinery. The repeated difficulties affecting the Truman Carrier Strike Group bring into focus the complexities of maintaining prolonged, high-stakes naval missions. Every F/A-18 Super Hornet constitutes a considerable monetary outlay, with contemporary valuations placing individual units near $60 million or higher. The disappearance of several airframes affects fiscal planning and also diminishes operational preparedness. Standard procedure dictates thorough inquiries after events of this nature. The naval service of the USA consistently prioritizes the well-being of its personnel alongside the safeguarding of its valuable hardware.

Initial Aircraft Lost During Hangar Operations

Before the landing incident, a different F/A-18E Super Hornet met its unfortunate end beneath the Red Sea's surface under completely distinct conditions. This preceding mishap unfolded slightly more than a week prior to the subsequent loss. The event transpired as the warplane was undergoing a towing procedure inside the hangar space of the USS Harry S. Truman. A formal US Navy communication revealed that the personnel guiding the aircraft regrettably failed to maintain command of the fighter plane during this repositioning. Consequently, the airframe, and the tow vehicle connected to it, both fell over the side. A service member involved in this hangar area event experienced slight physical harm. Some early information from American officials suggested the naval carrier might have performed an abrupt change in direction. Such a manoeuvre could have represented a defensive measure against hostile elements from Houthi groups in Yemen, possibly a factor in the plane's submersion. This situation emphasizes the persistent danger within the operational sphere of these naval platforms.

Second Fighter Disappears Amidst Landing Sequence

In the later episode, an F/A-18F Super Hornet initiated an approach for touchdown upon the flight area of the USS Harry S. Truman one Tuesday. During this vital stage of aviation activity, a specific flight action did not succeed. This unsuccessful action directly led to the warplane tipping over the edge into the ocean. The pair of individuals operating the Super Hornet, comprising a pilot and an officer for weapons systems, managed to exit the imperilled jet through ejection. Mercifully, their injuries from the ejection process and subsequent water entry were not serious. A rotary-wing aircraft belonging to Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron, designated HSC 11 and nicknamed the "Dragonslayers," quickly retrieved both airmen. This swift recovery action highlights the proficient search and rescue abilities integral to carrier deployments. HSC 11, the squadron in question, utilizes MH-60S Seahawk helicopters; its home base is Naval Air Station Norfolk.

Arresting Gear Malfunction Implicated in Touchdown Mishap

Authorities examining the second disappearance pinpointed a malfunction within an aircraft arrestment apparatus as a primary element. Naval carriers utilize a strong configuration of steel hawsers, known as arrestor equipment or arresting cables, laid out across the flight area. These serve to quickly reduce the speed of planes as they land. Aircraft such as the F/A-18 Super Hornet possess a tailhook mechanism. The pilot intends for this hook to catch one of the hawsers. Defence personnel indicated that, during this particular landing sequence, the arresting mechanism did not perform as expected. This directly resulted in the plane departing the deck. The precise faulty part or the exact problem with the arrestment setup awaits public disclosure, contingent on a comprehensive inquiry. Such equipment failures, while not common, can precipitate disastrous outcomes due to the restricted landing zones and high velocities inherent in carrier flight activities. The investigation will certainly involve a close inspection of the arrestor equipment’s state and its working specifications.

Image Credit - Freepik

The Naval Platform: USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Group

The eighth vessel in the Nimitz class of nuclear-propelled aircraft carriers is the USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75). This impressive warship entered service in July 1998, with its construction costs nearing $4.5 billion. The carrier, bearing the name of the 33rd American President, boasts an extensive and dynamic operational record, featuring many deployments. It has provided support for military endeavors like Southern Watch, Enduring Freedom, and Iraqi Freedom. During these campaigns, the carrier facilitated thousands of combat flights. The Truman Carrier Strike Group commenced its present mission in the Middle East region in September 2024. This period of service has involved a rapid pace of activities, especially within the Red Sea vicinity. These actions contribute to efforts aimed at deterring Houthi hostile acts and preserving safety in maritime zones. The carrier accommodates a substantial air contingent, generally Carrier Air Wing One (CVW-1). This unit includes a variety of airplanes and helicopters. The vessel's achievements include establishing a benchmark for the highest number of arrested landings within one day (335 in 2002). It also functioned as a trial platform for uncrewed aerial vehicles like the X-47B.

Spotlight on the F/A-18 Super Hornet Aircraft

Boeing manufactures the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, a key element of US Navy carrier-based air power. This twin-engine fighter is a multi-purpose machine, proficient in both aerial combat against other planes and surface attack missions. The "F" model, similar to the one that vanished during the landing procedure, features a two-person cockpit. It houses a pilot alongside a Weapon Systems Officer (WSO). The valuation of these planes is in the range of $60 million to $70 million for each unit. More recent Block III iterations command an even greater price. In March 2024, the Navy awarded Boeing a contract for an additional seventeen Block III Super Hornets, valued at $1.3 billion. Delivery of these new planes should occur by the spring of 2027. Even with the F-35C Lightning II joining the fleet, the Super Hornet continues as an indispensable resource. In early 2024, the US Navy possessed roughly 420 operational Super Hornets. Although recent disappearances represent a minor fraction of the total fleet, they nevertheless influence squadron preparedness. This is particularly noticeable during intensive deployment periods. The plane is recognized for its adaptability. It can carry a broad assortment of armaments.

Red Sea Area Tensions and Houthi Hostilities

The Red Sea has transformed into an increasingly hazardous domain for sea travel. Since November 2023, Houthi militants based in Yemen, who reportedly receive backing from Iran, have frequently aimed attacks at commercial marine traffic and naval ships in this area. These assaults often utilize unmanned aerial vehicles and missiles. The Houthi faction asserts these operations demonstrate solidarity with Palestinians and intend to exert pressure on Israel. The USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group has maintained active participation in Operation Prosperity Guardian. More recently, it took part in Operation Rough Rider, a campaign by US Central Command. This latter operation seeks to diminish Houthi military potential. Operation Rough Rider, initiated on March 15, 2025, has reputedly hit more than 800 locations within Yemen. The Houthi attacks have caused major interruptions to sea-based commerce. Numerous ships have found it necessary to divert their routes around Africa. This situation has affected international supply networks. These continuing aggressive actions formulate a difficult operational picture for naval units present in the locality.

Truce Discussions Amid Ongoing Operations

Merely a few hours before the second F/A-18 Super Hornet departed the Truman, the US President at that time, Donald Trump, declared a truce understanding with Houthi groups. This reported agreement, said to have Oman's mediation, specified that American forces would cease their aerial bombardment campaign. The understanding depended on the Houthis halting their assaults on vessels within the Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandeb Strait. Notwithstanding this declaration, certain accounts suggested Houthi elements might have directed fire towards the USS Harry S. Truman soon after the truce became public. The Pentagon subsequently offered a clarification. The Super Hornet that went missing during its landing attempt was not hit by Houthi projectiles. The intricate interaction between military actions and diplomatic endeavors defines the circumstances in this unstable maritime passage. Houthi leadership voiced a degree of doubt concerning the ceasefire news. They also reiterated their established position regarding Gaza.

Earlier Troubles for the Truman Contingent

The recent disappearances of the pair of Super Hornets do not represent the sole noteworthy troubles to impact the USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group over its present tour of duty. A regrettable friendly fire episode took place in December 2024. The guided-missile cruiser USS Gettysburg (CG-64), operating with the Truman's group, incorrectly engaged and brought down a different F/A-18F Super Hornet. This particular Super Hornet belonged to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 11, known as the "Red Rippers." This squadron is the same unit as one of the jets recently lost. It was conducting flight operations above the Red Sea when the incident happened. Both occupants of the plane from that December event also safely departed the aircraft via ejection and were subsequently brought to safety. One of them incurred slight physical harm. Furthermore, in February 2025, the USS Harry S. Truman itself experienced a collision. This event involved a merchant ship close to Port Said, Egypt. These occurrences, viewed collectively, highlight the varied dangers inherent in naval activities.

Image Credit - Freepik

The Demands of Carrier-Based Aviation

Operations involving aircraft carriers are fundamentally intricate and carry inherent risks. Propelling and retrieving high-capability airplanes from a moving, comparatively confined flight area under diverse meteorological states requires extraordinary proficiency. Both aviators and deck personnel need this high level of skill. The landing sequence, specifically, ranks among the most challenging undertakings for a naval pilot. Aviators have to align their machines with extreme precision relative to the carrier's angled flight path. They must also sustain a particular descent trajectory. Critically, they need to engage an arresting hawser with their aircraft's hook. All these actions unfold while dealing with the constant motion of the ship. The restricted extent of the runway presents an ongoing difficulty. The ever-shifting deck, erratic wind patterns, and the high concentration of air traffic represent persistent hurdles. Mechanical apparatus like catapults for launching and arrestor gear for recovery are indispensable. Any defect or failure can lead to prompt and grave repercussions. The mental strain upon pilots also contributes. This strain becomes particularly acute during nighttime missions or within high-stress environments.

Retrieval Efforts for Submerged Aircraft

When a military plane is lost to the sea, the United States Navy frequently initiates efforts to recover it. This is particularly the case for assets containing sensitive technology. Recovery is also a priority if an inquiry necessitates analysis of the wreckage. Such undertakings are notably complicated. Their success hinges on variables like the submerged plane's position, the water depth, and the aircraft's condition. The prevailing sea conditions also significantly influence recovery missions. The Navy employs highly skilled salvage divers for these tasks. Specialized ships equipped with heavy cranes and remotely guided underwater vehicles, often called ROVs, such as the CURV-21, are also key components of these operations. The CURV-21, to illustrate, has the capacity to function at impressive depths, reaching down to 20,000 feet. Its purpose is to find, evaluate, and secure rigging to items underwater. For broad area searches, the Navy deploys autonomous underwater vehicles, or AUVs, including the "Hugin" model. Bringing an aircraft up from substantial depths represents a lengthy and resource-heavy endeavor. Investigators consistently give top priority to retrieving downed aircraft. This practice aids in comprehending the causes of mishaps and in preventing similar future incidents.

Fiscal and Preparedness Consequences

The disappearance of even one advanced combat plane, such as an F/A-18 Super Hornet, triggers considerable fiscal effects. With individual aircraft costing many millions of dollars, several such losses amount to a major financial write-down. Separate from the immediate expense of replacement, additional costs arise. These encompass expenditures linked to recovery attempts, comprehensive investigations, and any essential repairs to the carrier or its ancillary equipment. These events likewise bear upon operational preparedness levels. Although the US Navy commands a substantial fleet, taking aircraft out of active deployment, even for a short duration, can place a burden on squadrons. This holds particularly true for units engaged in high-intensity operational cycles. Maintaining an ample quantity of mission-ready aircraft is paramount. This allows a carrier strike group to carry out its wide array of assigned duties effectively. These duties span from projecting military power and conducting combat missions to ensuring maritime security and providing humanitarian aid.

Ecological Impact of Sunken Aviation Assets

Military hardware submerged in marine environments, such as aircraft and vessels, can introduce ecological hazards. Over time, these underwater wrecks have the potential to leach chemical substances, remnants of fuel, and heavy metallic elements into the surrounding sea. While the direct consequences of a single downed aircraft might remain contained to a local area, the cumulative effect of multiple such events, when combined with historical wreckage from earlier conflicts, adds to the broader issue of marine contamination. Aircraft that have sunk are notable potential origins of oil leakage. Military endeavors naturally give precedence to national security concerns and operational goals. Nevertheless, an increasing recognition exists regarding the lasting environmental effects of naval undertakings. International collaborations and scientific inquiries are actively in progress. These initiatives strive to achieve a more profound understanding of, and to lessen, the ecological impact stemming from underwater munitions and submerged military equipment. The water depth in the Red Sea locations of these specific incidents will affect how any pollutants disperse and what their ultimate impact will be.

Naval Safety Protocols and Reviews

Safety holds a position of utmost importance within the US Navy. Subsequent to major incidents or a pattern of mishaps, the service frequently institutes comprehensive safety evaluations or temporary halts in operations. As an illustration, in June 2022, a sequence of crashes involved aircraft from both the Navy and the Marine Corps. In response, naval aviation units not currently deployed received directives to implement a one-day pause focused on safety. Such pauses provide an opportunity for units to scrutinize their risk-management approaches. They also facilitate training sessions on managing threats and errors, and they reinforce adherence to correct procedures. Inquiries into particular occurrences, such as the F/A-18 disappearances from the USS Harry S. Truman, seek to pinpoint the underlying causes. These causes might be mechanical failures, human mistakes, environmental influences, or procedural shortcomings. The objective is always to enact corrective measures designed to avert any recurrence. The ultimate purpose remains to derive lessons from these events. This process of learning serves to augment the safety and operational efficacy of naval aviation.

Image Credit - Freepik

Contribution of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron Eleven

Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron, unit HSC 11, known by the moniker "Dragonslayers," executed a vital function in the successful retrieval of the aircrew who had ejected during the second Super Hornet event. The squadron's origins trace back to 1957, when it was initially formed as Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron 11 (HS-11). It later adopted the MH-60S Seahawk helicopter, leading to its redesignation as HSC 11 in 2016. Stationed at Naval Air Station Norfolk in Virginia, HSC 11 forms a part of Carrier Air Wing 1. The squadron undertakes deployments aboard aircraft carriers. Its mission set is notably varied. It includes providing logistical support to the fleet, conducting search and rescue (SAR) operations, and performing medical evacuations. Additionally, the squadron handles support for special warfare units, engages in anti-surface warfare, and participates in humanitarian aid efforts. The MH-60S helicopters under its command are adaptable platforms. They come equipped for these diverse assignments, which can include the deployment of armaments such as Hellfire missiles and machine guns. Their prompt action during the Red Sea event underscores the essential life-preserving capacity that resides within a carrier strike group.

Future Trajectory and the Evolution of Naval Air Power

Notwithstanding these recent events, aircraft carriers alongside their associated air wings continue to be pivotal to American naval doctrine and its capacity for global power projection. The US Navy persists in allocating resources towards new aircraft suitable for carrier operations. Examples of this include the F-35C and upgraded versions of the F/A-18 Super Hornet. Investment also extends to novel carrier designs, such as those of the Ford class. The operational landscape, however, undergoes constant transformation. Fresh threats and new technological hurdles continually arise. Occurrences like those encountered by the strike group accompanying the USS Harry S. Truman act as significant reminders. They emphasize the rigorous demands of naval aviation. Unceasing enhancements in areas of training, technological development, maintenance practices, and safety regulations are fundamental. Such improvements are crucial for reducing risks and for guaranteeing the sustained operational effectiveness of this indispensable military arm. The insights gained from these mishaps in the Red Sea will undoubtedly shape the future practices of naval aviation.