RTS Smart Meter Switch Off Paused

UK Halts Energy Meter Switch-Off, Granting Reprieve to 300,000 Homes

A last-minute intervention has delayed the deactivation of a legacy electricity meter system, averting potential heating failures and unexpected bills for thousands of households across Great Britain.

The government confirmed a widespread shutdown affecting the Radio Teleswitch Service (RTS) will not proceed by the June 30th target. This move follows escalating concerns that unacceptably slow progress in replacing the decades-old technology could leave many thousands of homes in a perilous situation. Instead of a hard cutoff, the system will now be retired through a cautious, phased process. This decision provides critical breathing room for suppliers and offers reassurance to the many vulnerable customers who still rely on the aging network for their domestic heating needs.

With summer temperatures climbing, the prospect of a sudden switch-off raised alarms. Campaigners warned of a looming crisis where households could see their heating systems lock into a constantly active state during a heatwave or, conversely, find themselves with no means to heat water. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) acknowledged the original timetable was no longer realistic, opting for a more controlled and targeted approach to protect families from disruption.

A New, Cautious Approach

The new plan will launch with a small-scale pilot. Within a 21-day window, the retirement process will begin in targeted local areas and will not affect more than 600 residences. This initial phase is designed as a crucial test. Throughout this period, government and industry bodies will meticulously watch the performance of energy providers, especially their response times and the quality of their support for vulnerable people. This careful methodology aims to ensure that any problems can be promptly rectified before the programme is scaled up.

Energy Minister Miatta Fahnbulleh stated that the government stepped in to prevent sudden disruption for thousands of vulnerable consumers. She affirmed that she would be watching suppliers closely to ensure the transition is as smooth as possible. This new measured pace should reassure customers, but the underlying necessity for the meter exchange remains.

Understanding the Radio Teleswitch Service

The technology known as the Radio Teleswitch Service, or RTS, dates back to the 1980s. Its design specifically supported households that use electricity as their main source for warmth and for heating water. The system employs a long-wave radio signal, broadcast from a central transmitter, to communicate with older electricity meters across the country. This signal gives energy suppliers the ability to remotely alternate meters between different price plans, such as peak and off-peak.

This functionality is particularly important for customers on multi-rate tariffs like Economy 7 or Economy 10, which provide cheaper electricity at night. The RTS can also directly manage household heating appliances. It signals storage heaters and water tank immersion units to power up when electricity prices are reduced during the night, helping consumers to control their energy expenses effectively.

The End of an Era for a Long-Wave Lifeline

The core reason for the RTS retirement is the obsolescence of the technology. The service depends on the same infrastructure that carries the BBC's long-wave radio broadcasts, a network that is now at the end of its operational lifespan. The equipment sending the vital radio signals can no longer be properly maintained, since many necessary components are out of production. This unavoidable situation means the service must be shut down, making the replacement of all RTS-dependent meters essential.

The transition is a key component of the UK's broader push to modernise its energy infrastructure and create a smarter, more flexible grid. Smart meters are the designated technological replacement, as they can be programmed to deliver a similar service while offering modern benefits.

Image Credit - Freepik

A Deadline Fraught with Peril

Before the government's intervention, energy suppliers were working towards a hard cutoff of 30 June 2025 to move every client from the antiquated system. This target date had already been pushed back from March 2024 to give companies more time. However, reports preceding the latest delay highlighted serious difficulties with the changeover, sparking anxieties that approximately 300,000 residences might be left with an inoperable meter. Campaign groups including the End Fuel Poverty Coalition had warned ministers of an impending crisis, stating the replacement programme was showing signs of failure.

Government officials described the replacement rate as "unacceptably slow." Despite efforts to ramp up installations, by the end of May 2025, official data showed that 314,935 RTS meters in Great Britain still needed to be exchanged. This created a very real danger of widespread disruption, particularly for vulnerable households.

Voices from the Frontline of Installation Issues

The transition's difficulties are not just statistical; they represent real-world frustrations for many homeowners. Customers have consistently described trouble securing appointments for meter exchanges or have experienced later problems with the new devices. Some were informed their property was unsuitable for a smart meter due to weak signal strength, a frequent problem in rural locations or buildings with thick stone walls. Others were told that no current technology was suitable for integration with their home's heating configuration.

An anonymous couple near the West Sussex town of Chichester shared their prolonged struggle. They detailed three separate appointments with Ovo engineers, who all advised that a new smart meter was not installable because the local signal was too faint. This ongoing issue had persisted for about fifteen months, leaving them in a state of uncertainty as the cutoff date approached.

The Industry's Response and Technological Fixes

In reaction to widespread installation difficulties, the power sector has stated that technical fixes are now available for all properties. The sector's trade association, Energy UK, has urged any client who was previously informed a substitute was impossible to get back in touch with their provider immediately. The group insists that methods have been developed to fix problems like faint signal strength, ensuring no family is left out of the transition. These technological fixes include the provision of pre-programmed smart meters.

This is the precise remedy now on the table for the couple, following an inquiry by The Guardian. This type of device can be installed to run on a pre-set schedule, with the capability for a remote upgrade to full smart functionality once signal quality in the area improves. Ovo commented that it possesses remedies for such unusual circumstances and is dedicated to helping them.

The Spectre of Soaring Household Bills

Beyond the technical snags, a major source of anxiety for many consumers is the potential effect of the switch-off on their power bills. The legacy RTS setups are often central to cost-saving heating strategies. They allow certain types of heaters and water tank elements to accumulate power when electricity rates are much lower during overnight hours. Many customers fear that losing this specific control could cause their heating systems to charge at more costly daytime prices, leading to a sharp rise in their bills.

This concern is not baseless. Without a meter that can precisely separate peak and off-peak use, suppliers might be unable to invoice customers accurately, perhaps defaulting to a single, higher price. The move away from a familiar and financially stable system to new, and in some cases, unproven technology, has left many households worried about their future energy costs.

A Cautionary Tale of a Botched Switch

The story of Bryan Jones, a resident of the Cornish town of Redruth, serves as a stark warning about the potential traps of the meter exchange programme. EDF had replaced his meter a year and a half ago, an event he later described as a profoundly regrettable financial move. Initially, he discovered his new smart device had been configured improperly, which made it bill his entire electricity use at the higher daytime price. Although this was later fixed, the device then started to fail in other ways.

A recent look at his power use from January through April revealed that his smart device had wrongly billed one-third of his nighttime consumption at daytime prices because it was interfering with his heater's settings. To add to his frustration, the supplier failed to attend two later appointments arranged to swap out the faulty device. This case shows the severe financial fallout that can result from a poorly handled meter installation and later billing mistakes.

Image Credit - Freepik

Supplier Accountability and Customer Compensation

In the situation involving Mr. Jones, after the press made contact, his supplier, EDF, issued an apology regarding the string of missed visits and put a credit on his account. The company also began looking into the invoicing discrepancies that caused him to be overcharged. This underscores the duty of energy suppliers to ensure not only that meter installations are done correctly but also that dependable post-installation help and accurate billing are maintained.

Mr. Jones has now been placed on an urgent list for a replacement meter. The incident illustrates the critical need for suppliers to be held answerable for service delivery failures during this complex national infrastructure project. For many consumers, the worry remains that they could be left to deal with a maze of technical problems and billing arguments by themselves.

The Regulator's Pledge for Consumer Protection

Amid the worries, Great Britain's energy regulator, Ofgem, has made a clear public commitment. The regulator declared that no customer's finances should be negatively affected by the compulsory meter exchange. This pledge is a key part of the consumer protection framework for the transition. Ofgem also specified that suppliers must offer customers comparable or identical pricing plans after a customer's RTS meter is upgraded. This directive is designed to ensure people can keep their existing cost-saving plans, like Economy 7, with a new smart meter.

The regulator is actively collaborating with suppliers and consumer groups through a dedicated RTS Taskforce to monitor the process. While the rate of meter exchanges has jumped significantly, Ofgem has signalled a desire for the project to proceed even faster.

A Concentrated Challenge in Scotland

The task of substituting the outstanding RTS meters is not distributed evenly across Great Britain. Official data shows a notable concentration in Scotland, where around one-third of the outstanding devices are found. As of late May, this represented about 105,000 households, many of which are in rural or difficult-to-access locations. This geographic reality presents distinct logistical challenges for suppliers, including engineer availability and possible signal issues for the new smart meters.

Reports have indicated that people in rural Scottish areas are more likely to depend on electric storage heaters and, therefore, on RTS meters. This means the deactivation could have a disproportionately negative effect on these communities, where fuel poverty may already be a serious problem.

Intensified Government and Regulatory Oversight

Given the programme's slow progress and the risks to consumers, the government has announced a more direct role in monitoring. The minister for energy, Miatta Fahnbulleh, will now have fortnightly meetings with the regulator Ofgem and the trade body Energy UK. These sessions will be used to check on the advancement of the newly implemented gradual shutdown. A special focus of these talks will be on the Scottish situation, as well as other remote and rural locations, to ensure all possible efforts are made to reach these often-vulnerable households.

This heightened scrutiny signals a recognition at the highest levels that the transition needs careful supervision and strong accountability. The objective is to stop any households from being overlooked as the forty-year-old RTS network is finally decommissioned.

Reassuring the Public While Maintaining Urgency

Officials are trying to balance offering reassurance with stressing the continued need for action. Charlotte Friel, who directs retail pricing and systems for Ofgem, said the new careful strategy "should reassure customers." However, she also repeated the vital need for these meters to be replaced with urgency. This dual message shows that while the immediate danger of a mass shutdown has passed, the core issue of the obsolete technology persists.

Ms. Friel highlighted the importance of public cooperation, noting the importance of people engaging with their supplier as soon as an appointment is offered. The success of the revised, gradual retirement still hinges on suppliers making contact with customers and homeowners giving access so the necessary upgrade work can be finished promptly.

Image Credit - Freepik

A Process 'Doomed to Failure'

Consumer advocacy groups have been sharp in their criticism of how the RTS deactivation has been managed. The coordinator for the End Fuel Poverty Coalition, Simon Francis, described the original plan as being bound to fail. He argued it was clear the single, immovable target date was not achievable given the task's scale and the slow progress by the energy sector. His organisation had warned of a potential crisis for months, pointing to the danger of leaving many thousands of households without a way to get heat or warm water.

Campaigners have viewed the government's decision to delay the mass deactivation and use a phased plan as a necessary and welcome move. Mr. Francis commented that ministers are right to be taking control of the situation and holding both Ofgem and the energy suppliers responsible for the programme's execution.

The Demand for a Clear and Public Roadmap

Following the government's news of a phased shutdown, campaigners are now calling for complete transparency. The End Fuel Poverty Coalition has requested the publication of a detailed schedule that clearly shows how the gradual deactivation will happen. Simon Francis stated that a published plan is now required, one that details the staged shutdown and specifies which localities will be involved and on what schedule. This call for a public roadmap aims to give clarity and certainty to the many thousands of households still involved.

A transparent schedule would let consumers, as well as local support groups and housing associations, get ready for the transition in their area. It would also permit more effective tracking of the industry's progress against a clear and public set of targets.

Seeking Iron-Clad Guarantees for Households

Beyond a clear schedule, the main demand from consumer advocates is for solid and enforceable promises to protect every household. The End Fuel Poverty Coalition insists that two vital guarantees must be established. First, a promise that every customer will retain the ability to heat their home or water because of the switch-off process. Second, a solid commitment that no family will experience increased bills due to the mandated changes to their metering.

These demands echo Ofgem's own "no detriment" principle, but campaigners want this to be converted from a regulatory hope into a real guarantee. The fear remains that without such strong protections, vulnerable consumers could face financial hardship or the loss of essential services.

The Broader Smart Meter Challenge

The problems around the RTS retirement are indicative of the UK's wider, and often difficult, national smart meter rollout. For over a decade, the government has been promoting the installation of smart meters in every home, a programme designed to boost energy efficiency and modernise the grid. However, the rollout has been plagued by delays, technical problems, and difficulties with public acceptance. Reports have shown that millions of installed smart meters are not working in 'smart' mode, and there are large differences in installation rates across the country.

Signal issues are a recurring problem, particularly in rural and remote locations, and also in buildings with thick walls that can impede the meter's communication. These long-running difficulties with the wider smart meter initiative provide an important backdrop for the specific challenges now emerging in the replacement of obsolete RTS meters.

A Reprieve, Not a Resolution

The government's move to postpone the nationwide RTS switch-off has successfully prevented an immediate crisis for more than 300,000 homes. The shift from a strict deadline to a gradual, monitored retirement is a practical response to the clear shortcomings in the replacement programme. It offers vital protection for consumers and imposes greater accountability on energy suppliers. However, this is a delay, not a final solution.

The fundamental task remains: to safely and equitably move every household from a 40-year-old technology to a modern smart meter. The focus now turns to the execution of this new, more measured plan. Success will hinge on suppliers navigating logistical challenges, regulators enforcing consumer protections, and vulnerable households getting the specific support they require. The next few months will be crucial in showing whether this more careful strategy can ultimately provide a smooth and secure transition for everyone.