British TV Future Faces Tough Global Streaming Fights

British Television's Fight for the Future: Navigating the Streaming Onslaught

The United Kingdom's television sector stands at a critical juncture. Giants of American streaming, with their vast financial power, present a formidable challenge to the continuation of traditional British broadcasters. Industry leaders and creatives actively debate strategies to ensure the unique character of UK-produced and focused television endures for future generations. This evolving landscape demands innovative thinking and decisive action.

A Christmas Conclave: Seeds of Change

Just before the festive season, Tim Davie, who heads the BBC, hosted a significant lunch. He gathered leading UK television executives and creative minds at the Charlotte Street Hotel in London's Fitzrovia. Amidst vibrant decor, the conversation centred on the very continuation of their professional field. Some participants voiced deep concerns over what they perceive as a severe financial shortfall, exacerbated by the dominance of worldwide internet-delivered entertainment platforms such as Netflix, Disney Plus, and Amazon. One suggestion floated was a potential combination between BBC Studios, the corporation's business-focused content creation unit, and Channel 4. This idea aimed to establish a more potent British entity. Although another attendee quickly dismissed this notion, Mr Davie reportedly questioned why such a proposal was considered entirely unfeasible. This exchange highlights a growing belief within the television sphere: no option should be off-limits when considering the future.

The Consolidation Conundrum

Many voices within the television profession contribute to this urgent discussion, though some prefer anonymity. Sir Peter Bazalgette, previously the chair at ITV, stated that the current array of British broadcasters—including the BBC, Channel 5, ITV, and Channel 4—will likely require some form of amalgamation or, at a minimum, significantly enhanced cooperation. He warned of a potential future lacking any providers of community-oriented television programming in about ten years, or certainly in two decades, if no endurance strategy materialises. He stressed the gravity of this and urged regulators to begin formulating plans. Mergers, Sir Peter suggested, could very likely form a component of the resolution, leading to fewer, stronger companies. This sentiment underscores a growing unease about the long-term viability of the existing structure.

Image Credit - BBC

A Call for Fewer, Stronger Players

Lord Vaizey, who served as Culture Minister when David Cameron was Prime Minister, offered a stark opinion. He advocated for the unification of Channel 5, Channel 4, and ITV. In his view, the UK market has space for only two major domestic broadcasters. This direct call for radical restructuring reflects a belief that scale is essential to compete in the modern media environment. Such a move would dramatically reshape the British television landscape, concentrating resources but also potentially reducing the diversity of voices and content. The debate hinges on whether such consolidation would ultimately benefit or harm the viewing public and the creative sector.

Distinctiveness: A Viewer's Virtue?

However, not everyone agrees with the push for mergers. Sarah Rose, who is President of Channel 5, strongly contested Lord Vaizey's view, describing his outlook as a calamitous forecast. She emphasised that Channel 5 is a profitable entity. The channel actively channels resources into lesser-known program development businesses, fostering new talent. Ms Rose argued that Channel 5 contributes to a wide selection of material for audiences in the United Kingdom. Consolidating to a single commercial channel, she warned, would drastically reduce the variety of programmes available, funnelling material through a much narrower conduit. This perspective champions the value of distinct offerings and the risk of homogenisation.

Channel 4's Stance: Competition Breeds Excellence

Channel 4 also firmly repudiates any notion of amalgamation. Alex Mahon, the broadcaster's departing Chief Executive Officer, argued that United Kingdom's community-focused television achieves its high quality precisely because of the singular competitive arrangement. This rivalry, she highlighted, exists between entities supported by public funds and those driven by commercial revenue. This viewpoint suggests that the existing ecosystem, with its inherent contest and diverse funding models, is a strength rather than a weakness. It implies that maintaining this dynamic tension is crucial for continued excellence and innovation in British programming. Preserving this distinctiveness, Channel 4 believes, best serves the audience.

The Fading Era of Terrestrial Television

The familiar experience of switching on a television to discover a digital schedule presenting various stations—typically with BBC1, BBC2, ITV, Channel 4, and Channel 5 listed—is gradually vanishing. A significant shift looms, with 2035 suggested as the start of a transformed television period. This date could mark the conclusion of conventional broadcast television in its familiar configuration. As expensive contracts for supplying television station signals and land-based digital platforms such as Freeview conclude, UK broadcasters will likely transition to exclusively providing online, view-when-desired video content. This pivot is inevitable but requires careful planning.

Protecting Vulnerable Audiences in Digital Shift

The move towards a digital-only television landscape will not proceed without considerable effort to protect certain audience segments. Campaigners will rightly insist on safeguards for older people. Many seniors rely on traditional broadcast services and may find a rapid switch to internet-based platforms challenging. Rural households, often contending with poorer internet infrastructure, also require specific consideration. Furthermore, low-income families who may lack high-quality internet access must not be left behind. Ensuring equitable access for all remains a critical hurdle in this digital transition.

Image Credit - BBC

The 2035 Question: A New TV World?

If television aerials indeed become obsolete in 2035, it raises a pivotal question: will this moment redefine television permanently? Should the landscape transform into a direct confrontation between UK-based online-only entertainment providers and their substantially wealthier US counterparts, the continuation of British services becomes a pressing concern. Crucially, this shift also forces a consideration of what material audiences will ultimately consume. Will distinctly British stories find their place, or will globalised material dominate the screens of the future? The implications are profound for national culture and identity.

Television in 2035: A Glimpse Ahead

Projecting ahead to activating a television set in the year 2035, one can anticipate definite advancements in technology. Audiences might encounter more captivating ways to watch programs. Perhaps some shows will be experienced via specialized eyewear that overlays digital information. Despite these potential innovations, the shared large display will highly likely remain a customary household feature. However, by then, speech commands will probably be the standard method of control. This blend of familiar habits with new technology will define the viewing environment.

YouTube's Ascent to the Big Screen

The alteration in viewing habits has already commenced. YouTube users increasingly migrate their viewing from smaller devices to larger television screens. Fresh statistics supplied by Barb Audiences for 2024 indicate that, in a first, television receivers became the primary apparatus for consuming YouTube material at home. Television displays accounted for 41 percent of YouTube consumption, surpassing mobile telephones at 31 percent. This trend suggests a significant evolution in how audiences engage with online video platforms, treating them more like traditional television channels.

The Unstoppable Force of Global Platforms

With YouTube demonstrating seemingly irresistible momentum, within a decade this platform might very possibly emerge as the preferred entertainment source for most people. Kate Scott-Dawkins, who holds the role of Global President for Business Intelligence at the media investment firm Group M, predicts a continued movement. She anticipates that audience engagement duration and income from advertisements will increasingly favour internationally expansive companies and platforms featuring creator-driven material, such as TikTok and YouTube, all developing over the approaching half-decade. Giants such as Amazon, Apple, Disney, and Netflix will also likely maintain their strong presence. These global players, predominantly US-based, often possess diverse revenue streams beyond media, including theme attractions, electronic equipment manufacturing, or extensive e-commerce operations.

An Existential Battle for UK Broadcasters

The reporter learned from Kate Scott-Dawkins that television providers in the United Kingdom are confronting a struggle that might determine their very continuation. Their opponents are American media corporations possessing vastly dissimilar commercial strategies. The transition to internet-based television viewing, she notes, has allowed major international entities to expand their scale. These entities can then heavily invest in material for global viewership. The financial muscle of these significant, well-funded companies allows them to secure prominent placement, such as dedicated buttons on particular remote devices or prime positions on advanced television initial screens.

The Power of Owning the Ecosystem

Looking to the future, Ms Scott-Dawkins asserts a belief that controlling the actual software platforms will confer a significant advantage. This control extends beyond just the entertainment material to the very systems people use to watch it. Examples of this integration include Apple presenting its movies and program series on Apple TV units and iPhone handsets. Similarly, Amazon distributes its original shows through its Fire hardware. Google also utilizes its proprietary computers and mobile devices to deliver programs. This vertical integration presents a formidable challenge to standalone broadcasters.

Image Credit - BBC

The Stark Financial Disparities

One aspect of the difficulty lies in the inability of United Kingdom’s traditional broadcast stations to match the monetary power of the internet-based services. As an illustration, Netflix currently holds an estimated worth in the hundreds of billions of pounds. Since the year 2010, the BBC experienced a reduction in its actual revenue equivalent to 30 percent, translating to a one billion pounds annual decrease, primarily because the value of the public funding charge has diminished.

The stock market valuation for ITV has not fully rebounded following the slump in advertising during 2022, even though ITV Studios, its extensive content creation division, helped elevate its pre-tax profits. Concurrently, Channel 4 documented a financial shortfall for the 2023 calendar period, though Alex Mahon, its departing Chief Executive, communicated to Parliament an expectation of achieving something close to a balanced budget within the current twelve-month cycle. These figures highlight the financial pressures on UK broadcasters.

Calls for Enhanced Support and Tax Incentives

Recent reports from the Culture, Media and Sport Committee emphasise the need for urgent government intervention to support British film and high-end television. The committee advocates for enhanced tax incentives for domestic high-end TV and suggests that streamers like Netflix should contribute more. There are concerns that without such measures, distinctly British content, crucial for national identity and talent development, is under threat. Some industry figures, like director Peter Kosminsky, have warned that acclaimed productions such as 'Wolf Hall' might not be made today due to funding challenges. Producer Jane Featherstone also noted that streamers' business models often necessitate global appeal, potentially sidelining uniquely British stories. Lawmakers are even considering a 5% tariff on foreign streamers to help fund local productions.

A Unified Gateway: A Potential Lifeline?

Some television industry insiders propose a singular access point or application for every piece of community-oriented programming. This would mean a unified location to access all the programs from the BBC, Channel 5, Channel 4, and ITV. Alex Mahon conveyed not long ago to a news publication that United Kingdom television providers require enhanced cooperation, specifically mentioning avoiding redundant development of similar technological infrastructures. ITV allocated sums reaching into the hundreds of millions to develop ITVX, its internet-based service designed for the current era. Channel 4 adopted an innovative strategy for its internal shift to digital methods, introducing the 4oD service as early as 2006. However, maintaining a competitive up-to-date delivery system requires substantial ongoing investment, which might be unsustainable for individual entities over an extended period.

The iPlayer Super-Platform Idea

Lord Hall, who previously served as the BBC's chief, joins others in contending that independent operation by separate television providers is an unviable long-range prospect. He suggests that the current model of each entity maintaining its distinct access gateways while trying to match immense internet-based entertainment services is unlikely to endure. This has led to suggestions, from numerous television sector professionals, that BBC iPlayer, a platform developed using taxpayer funds, could evolve into the access point for additional United Kingdom community-focused media offerings. One television manager described this vision as a singular, large internet-based entertainment provider under the iPlayer banner, terming it an up-to-date community-oriented streaming facility. The argument rests on iPlayer being the most rapidly expanding internet-based entertainment service within the United Kingdom and the sole currently operational platform possessing a believable magnitude to effectively contend.

Challenges to a Shared Platform

While Freely, a newer streaming service launched in 2024, already hosts content from the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5 and others, the notion of presenting a unified PSB platform using the BBC iPlayer identity faces hurdles. Business-oriented television companies would probably resist such a move, preferring to maintain their distinct brand identities. Lord Hall acknowledged this, suggesting it might carry a distinct identity. He also pointed out that viewers would need to adapt to a system where content from the BBC remains without commercials, while other material on the shared system would include paid promotional messages. This delicate balance would be crucial for any such collaborative venture to succeed.

Image Credit - BBC

Déjà Vu: The Ghost of Project Kangaroo

Should the concept of a cooperative internet entertainment provider seem recognizable, the reason is its suggestion some time in the past. Project Kangaroo represented an initiative by Channel 4, ITV, and BBC Worldwide, aiming to establish a United Kingdom-based collaborative platform for viewing programs at one's convenience, conceived as a nascent competitor to Netflix. Nevertheless, the Competition Commission in the United Kingdom halted that endeavor in the year 2009, citing apprehensions that it might negatively impact rivalry within the developing market for view-when-desired video services. This historical precedent serves as a reminder of the regulatory obstacles that any significant collaboration or merger in the UK broadcasting sector might face. Similar merger attempts in other European countries, such as France and the Netherlands, have also been impeded due to rivalry considerations.

Regulatory Scrutiny and Strategic Imperatives

Any kind of unification involving distinct community-focused television providers would undoubtedly encounter an identical level of examination from regulatory bodies like Ofcom. This regulatory landscape is why figures like Sir Peter Bazalgette are urgently appealing for United Kingdom political figures and oversight authorities to concentrate on developing a clear strategy. The alternative, he warns, could be the conclusion of UK television in its present, recognizable state. The government has recently introduced media law reforms to modernise merger rules and address foreign state influence, reflecting the evolving media environment. The Media Act 2024, which received Royal Assent in May 2024, aims to reform television and radio broadcasting regulation, with Ofcom leading its implementation. Ofcom's reviews also highlight ongoing challenges for PSBs in connecting with audiences despite digital-first strategies.

Does It Matter to the Audience?

While industry executives and producers grapple with these challenges, a key question remains: is this a significant concern for the viewing public if the conventional television providers transform or diminish? Netflix and other streamers are already producing British-centric stories like 'Adolescence', 'Toxic Town', and 'Baby Reindeer'. These productions demonstrate that compelling UK narratives can find a home on global platforms. So, apart from the evident requirement of a paid membership, what is the inherent issue if the source of British material shifts? The answer, some argue, lies in the broader ecosystem.

The Indispensable Role of Public Service Broadcasters

Sarah Rose contends the situation possesses considerably greater intricacy. She states that the artistic professionals participating in such successful streaming productions frequently gained their initial experience within community-focused television. One advantage of conventional television providers, in her opinion, is their function as a conduit for nurturing skilled individuals. Sir Peter Bazalgette further maintains that these institutions are increasingly indispensable in the current era of artificial intelligence. He believes they must function as an exemplary benchmark of dependable information, vital for democratic society, especially when navigating the cacophonous digital sphere. He also champions television content that mirrors collective principles and engages in the country's ongoing dialogue. Such unique British stories, like ITV's 'Mr Bates vs The Post Office', the BBC's 'Wolf Hall', or Channel 4's 'It's A Sin', might not be prioritised by US-based streamers focused on global appeal.

Supporting Risk and Preserving Identity

Lord Hall asserts that supporting program creators in undertaking venturesome projects aligns perfectly with the BBC's intended role. He adds, however, that the corporation has unfortunately curtailed these efforts because of persistent reductions to the public funding allocation. The financial strain on PSBs makes it harder to commission shows that resonate deeply with British audiences but may lack immediate international commercial appeal. This squeeze on funding threatens the very essence of public service broadcasting: to inform, educate, and entertain with content that reflects and shapes national identity. Independent producers also face significant pressures, with many at risk of closure if market conditions do not improve. Proposals for levies on streamers aim to create a fund to support this uniquely British content.

The AI Revolution: Threat or Opportunity?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents both challenges and opportunities for the UK television industry. While some fear AI could diminish creative roles, others see its potential in various stages of production, from script analysis to automated camera operations and personalised content delivery. The BBC has already integrated AI into its news studios for production efficiencies. Companies like Banijay are even funding AI-created content. However, ethical considerations, copyright issues, and the need to ensure AI complements rather than replaces human creativity are paramount. The UK aims to navigate this by fostering ethical AI development, potentially creating an export market for responsibly produced AI-assisted content.

Image Credit - BBC

Streamers: Competitors and Unwitting Allies?

American streaming services are undeniably a fixture in the UK media landscape. These companies invest vast sums in material, and frequently, individuals from the United Kingdom who champion the nation's community-focused television landscape manage their UK divisions. There's a perception within Netflix, for instance, that their powerful presence is sometimes used strategically to convince governmental bodies about the necessity for enhanced safeguards for the United Kingdom's conventional television providers. However, criticism has also been levelled at the BBC for supposedly desiring complete control in collaborations, retaining artistic choices while seeking co-production funding. This complex relationship highlights the intertwining fates of PSBs and streamers. Analysis also shows that co-commissions between PSBs and US streamers have actually increased recently, suggesting a nuanced rather than purely adversarial dynamic.

The Enduring Legacy and Future Vision

Tim Davie, who is the BBC Director General, continues to strategically prepare the BBC for the upcoming reassessment of its operational agreement beyond the year 2027. In this context, the television environment is undergoing rapid transformation, and the obstacles ahead are evident. Lord Hall conveyed his belief that people's experiences gain value from both the offerings of internet entertainment services and the contributions of community-focused television providers. He expressed that failing to expand upon the potential contributions of the BBC and similar organizations is inconceivable. Sir Peter Bazalgette forecasts that insufficient scale will prove inadequate. He further elaborated that successful entities must possess the necessary magnitude to finance premium dramatic productions capable of attracting new service users and also to preserve extensive archives of material to ensure existing users remain satisfied.

He asserts that society currently exists within an era of "any time, any place, anywhere" internet entertainment consumption. The central query remains if the individuals guiding the community-focused television providers possess the capability to devise an effective strategy to protect their sector's invaluable contribution to British culture and society. The global demand for British TV content remains strong, highlighting its inherent value. Recent strategies from broadcasters like Channel 5, which is rebranding to '5' and focusing on a dual linear and streaming ambition with increased marketing, show an active adaptation to the new environment. ITV also reports steady performance with strong digital growth from ITVX, demonstrating resilience. Ultimately, the future of British television hinges on balancing collaboration, innovation, robust funding, and a continued commitment to uniquely British storytelling.