Church of England Faces Leadership Crisis

A Crown of Thorns: The Impossible Quest for Canterbury's Next Leader

The Church of England needs a new leader. The search follows Justin Welby’s sudden departure, which left a void at the top of a deeply divided organisation. In university cafes and parish halls nationwide, one topic now dominates discussions: who can possibly fill the role of Archbishop of Canterbury? Even more directly, who would desire it? The job is viewed less as a sacred privilege and more as a thankless burden.

The General Synod, which functions as the church’s parliament, is now convening amidst scandal and discord. This gathering occurs eight months after Mr Welby resigned, a choice compelled by his management of a particularly distressing abuse case. The procedure to find his replacement is painstakingly slow and lacks transparency, amplifying the feeling of crisis. For many observers, the effort to find the 106th person to hold the Canterbury title seems not like a sacred undertaking, but a frantic search for a leader prepared to accept what many term an impossible assignment.

The Shadow of a Scandal

Justin Welby’s time as archbishop concluded with sorrow and disgrace. He announced he was stepping down after the Makin Report, an independent investigation, presented a damning judgment on his inaction regarding horrific abuse allegations. The report detailed the offenses of John Smyth, a well-known lawyer who victimised over 100 boys and young men at Christian camps for several decades. The abuse was characterised as "brutal and horrific."

Mr Welby learned of the accusations in 2013, soon after he was appointed to Canterbury, but did not ensure the police were properly notified. The review determined that this failure to act meant Smyth was not apprehended earlier. In his resignation speech, Mr Welby conceded his "personal and institutional responsibility" for the church’s shortcomings and expressed deep "shame." His exit highlighted a far broader safeguarding crisis that has troubled the institution for years.

A Culture of Concealment

The archbishop’s resignation happens in the context of extensive historical sexual abuse inside the Church of England. A 2022 inquiry determined that the church cultivated a culture that allowed abusers to remain hidden. It was a framework that frequently offered greater support to alleged offenders than to their victims. This extensive, grim past of abuse and its concealment now casts a pall over the selection of the subsequent leader.

Any prospective nominee will be intensely scrutinised for their personal record on safeguarding. The capacity to guide the church on this matter is no longer merely a preferred attribute; it has become a core necessity. The church’s followers, and the public at large, are calling for a leader who can show a true dedication to establishing a safer institution and ensuring accountability for abusers and their enablers. This elevates the risk associated with the selection process considerably.

Image Credit - NY Times

The Secretive Path to Power

The method for selecting the future Archbishop of Canterbury is protracted and intricate. In stark contrast to the rapid 17-day conclave that can choose a new pope, the English church is anticipated to use nearly a full year. The Crown Nominations Commission (CNC) is the 17-person body with the duty of putting forward a successor to Mr Welby. This group does not follow a standard hiring process; individuals do not apply for the position. Its purpose is instead to ascertain God's calling for the ministry.

The CNC’s sessions occur behind closed doors. Following a sequence of consultations and debates, it will propose one name to the prime minister. That recommendation is then forwarded by Downing Street to the reigning monarch for a final sign-off. This historic practice blends prayerful consideration with the official machinery of the British state, rendering the choice a matter of both ecclesiastical and national importance.

An Ex-Spy and Global Voices

This year, the CNC features a distinctive makeup. It is the first time the body has included five delegates from the worldwide Anglican church, a nod to the archbishop's position as a figurehead for over 85 million members globally. The commission is also made up of bishops, priests, and non-ordained people from the General Synod and the Canterbury Diocese. Adding a further layer of interest, Jonathan Evans, a former director-general of MI5, is presiding over the meetings.

The presence of international representatives acknowledges the profound disagreements within the Anglican Communion, especially concerning sexuality. The selection of delegates from the Canterbury diocese also proved challenging, needing three separate attempts to be finalised. Although officially attributed to clerical mistakes, the repeat votes ignited rumours of internal power struggles between liberal and conservative groups seeking to sway the final decision.

A House Divided by Doctrine

Same-sex marriage is the most combustible topic confronting the Church of England. For many years, the organisation has been fractured by sharp disagreements about whether to permit blessings for same-sex unions. The "Living in Love and Faith" initiative, which aimed to promote discussion, has instead underscored the apparently insurmountable divide separating progressives from traditionalists. Any would-be archbishop has to tread through this theological danger zone.

Conservative evangelicals have stated their position unequivocally. They deem any nominee who endorsed a November 2023 letter that favoured official blessings for same-sex partnerships as completely unelectable. This viewpoint immediately erects a significant barrier for multiple top candidates. The entrenched conflict risks stalling the selection process and brings up the prospect of a lasting division within the church.

The Threat of a Global Split

The argument over sexuality extends beyond national borders; it echoes throughout the worldwide Anglican Communion. A majority of Anglican provinces, especially those in the Global South, adhere to the conventional belief that marriage is solely between a man and a woman. These conservative churches interpret any steps toward acknowledging same-sex unions as a deviation from scriptural principles.

Their new representation on the CNC grants them considerable sway. Choosing a leader who vocally endorses same-sex blessings might provoke a complete rupture with these influential global affiliates. This puts the CNC in an extremely delicate situation. It needs to select a leader for the English church who can also keep a fracturing global fellowship intact, a feat that may well be unachievable.

The Paralysis of a Two-Thirds Majority

The voting regulations of the CNC exacerbate the problem. An appointee must gain the backing of two-thirds of the commissioners. This steep requirement provides a strong veto to minority groups. Those who oppose blessings for same-sex unions could readily obstruct any nominee they find too liberal, just as progressives could do the same to a dedicated conservative.

This situation has already led to impasses in several recent diocesan bishop appointments, causing important roles to go vacant for long stretches. The possibility of a stalemated CNC for the Canterbury opening is significant. The commission might become incapable of settling on a nominee, pushing the church into a more profound constitutional crisis when it urgently requires firm leadership.

The Contender with a Compelling Story

Of all the leading candidates, the Bishop of Chelmsford, Guli Francis-Dehqani, offers a remarkable personal history. She came to Britain as a young refugee after her family escaped Iran following the 1980 revolution. Her experience with displacement and faith connects powerfully with a church trying to find its place in a diverse and evolving society.

However, Bishop Francis-Dehqani is also among the 44 bishops who put their name to the letter that supports blessings for same-sex unions. This action makes her a principal target for conservative opposition, from within the Church of England and across the global communion. While her advocates view her as a brave and modern leader, her progressive views might render her candidacy unacceptable to the required supermajority.

The Steadying Choice

Dame Sarah Mullally, who is the Bishop of London, is broadly considered a competent and reassuring option. Before she was ordained, she had an eminent career in the National Health Service, eventually becoming the government’s lead nursing officer. This background lends her substantial authority as an administrator of a vast and intricate organisation. She holds the third-highest rank in the church and is a member of the House of Lords.

As a possible short-term selection, Bishop Mullally might be seen as a stabilising figure to steer the church through its pressing difficulties without enacting any sweeping changes. Her public remarks on divisive topics have been deliberately cautious. Yet, some wonder if a capable administrator is sufficient, contending that the church requires a bold innovator, not merely a temporary overseer.

Image Credit - NY Times

The Cautious Diplomat

The Bishop of Bath and Wells, Michael Beasley, has carefully navigated the space between the church’s conflicting groups. A one-time epidemiologist who contributed to the church’s Covid response team, he is respected for his sharp mind and thoughtful manner. He has intentionally refrained from aligning too closely with either the progressive or the traditionalist sides regarding matters of sexuality.

This diplomatic positioning could make him a tempting compromise for a deadlocked CNC. He may be able to gather the essential two-thirds vote by appealing to the wide centre ground. The danger, though, is that he might be perceived as lacking firm principles by both camps, a leader without the courage of his convictions and therefore not fully trusted by anyone.

The Interim Leader

Stephen Cottrell, in his capacity as Archbishop of York, is the current acting head of the Church of England. He is set to supervise the church’s affairs until a successor for the Canterbury role is named. His office naturally positions him as a possible contender, and he has an extensive record of service, having been ordained as a deacon at 25.

Nonetheless, numerous commentators feel his age could be a drawback. Now 66, he would probably serve a shorter tenure than is customary for someone in the Canterbury position. Although he has backed Justin Welby’s choice to accept accountability for institutional mistakes, his association with the former leadership could be viewed as a liability when many are demanding a complete departure from the past.

The High-Risk Candidate

Martyn Snow, Leicester’s bishop, was at one point a prominent candidate for the highest position. His candidacy is now viewed with caution, however, because of safeguarding issues. A BBC report looked into his handling of a stalking allegation, which is said to have resulted in him offering an apology to the affected individual.

Given the present circumstances, as the church grapples with the conclusions of the Makin Report, any nominee with even a slight question mark over their safeguarding record faces a difficult path. The CNC will be keenly conscious that selecting an individual who might become a weak point in this area would be a calamitous error. This level of examination makes Bishop Snow’s route to Canterbury particularly challenging.

A Job of Impossible Proportions

The duties of the Archbishop of Canterbury have expanded to a nearly overwhelming degree. The individual in this position is looked to for spiritual direction by a country that is not always receptive. They are also required to participate in legislative debates in the House of Lords, serving as a source of moral commentary in the national dialogue.

At the same time, they function as the chief executive of a sprawling Church of England, with 42 separate dioceses that jealously protect their independence. The role also involves officiating at significant state events, from coronations to royal funerals, which reflects the church’s constitutional position. Finally, they serve as the symbolic leader of the worldwide Anglican Communion, with the responsibility of uniting its varied and often clashing groups.

Leading a Church in Decline

Whoever assumes this complex post will also need to address the harsh truth of the English church’s dwindling numbers. Attendance statistics present a sobering view of an organisation finding it hard to engage with contemporary Britain. Between 2003 and 2022, the average number of adults at Sunday services dropped from 802,000 to 477,000. The count of children present has decreased by over half in that time.

While a minor recovery has occurred since the pandemic, the overall trajectory is one of persistent decline. The church’s demographic is rapidly aging; in 2022, more than a third of its attendees were beyond the age of seventy. The person chosen as the next archbishop must take on the immense challenge of breathing new life into a waning institution and conveying a message of faith to an ever more secular and disinterested public.

The Final, Fateful Choice

The Crown Nominations Commission is not merely charged with the challenge of selecting an individual; it must also chart the future course for the Church of England. Its decision will be a clear indicator of whether the institution is heading towards progressive change, conservative reinforcement, or a period of managed decline. The consequences are immense.

The protracted and confidential selection procedure will in time yield a single candidate. That individual, be they a reformer, an administrator, or a consensus-builder, will receive a heavy burden. They will require extraordinary ability, fortitude, and ethical strength to guide a fractured church and a diminishing congregation. The most urgent uncertainty persists: can the CNC locate such a figure, or will the Canterbury role prove too burdensome for anyone to bear?