Palm Oil Deception In Biofuels

The Murky World of Green Diesel: Fraud Allegations Plague the HVO Market

The UK government has launched an investigation into potential fraud within the rapidly growing HVO diesel market. This inquiry follows a BBC report uncovering possible widespread misrepresentation of non-waste materials.

HVO, or hydrotreated vegetable oil, is widely praised as a sustainable fuel alternative. Advocates highlight its ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 90%. However, this environmental benefit depends on the fuel being derived from waste sources, such as recycled cooking oil.

However, industry whistleblowers alerted the BBC to suspected fraudulent practices. They suspect vast quantities of virgin palm oil are being falsely labeled as waste and entering the HVO supply chain. Data analysis by the BBC, shared with the Department for Transport, fuels these suspicions. "Palm sludge waste," a crucial HVO component, raises particular concerns. In 2023, European HVO and biofuel consumption of this alleged waste material exceeded global production estimates. The Department for Transport has affirmed its commitment to addressing the issue, working closely with stakeholders and international partners to conduct a thorough investigation.

HVO’s Meteoric Rise and Environmental Concerns

HVO has recently gained traction as a potential alternative fuel, offering a direct replacement for diesel. This presents an opportunity to mitigate rising global temperatures. British HVO consumption has risen dramatically, growing from around 10 million litres in 2019 to nearly 680 million litres in recent estimates.

The sustainability of HVO largely hinges on its raw material origins. Ideally, it should be derived from waste sources like recycled cooking oil and residual palm oil byproducts, which help minimize environmental impact. However, industry insiders allege frequent substitution with non-waste substances, such as raw palm oil. This approach has severe environmental repercussions, as the cultivation of virgin palm oil drives deforestation in tropical regions and worsens existing ecological concerns. One prominent European biofuel producer likened the palm oil influx to a rapidly spreading disease, describing the pressure to misrepresent ingredients to stay competitive. They felt compelled to participate in the mislabeling of raw palm oil as waste product.

Whistleblower Testimony and Statistical Discrepancies

The BBC obtained testimony from an anonymous source—a former commodities dealer specializing in biofuels—who described a transaction involving alleged waste products. The source believes the materials were actually virgin palm oil shipments falsely labeled as waste palm oil byproduct.

The source expressed concerns to a company executive, who showed no interest in investigating, fearing what an inquiry might uncover. This verbal evidence is further supported by statistical discrepancies.

BBC analysis of this report, based on United Nations and industry data, estimates annual palm sludge production at more than a million tonnes—contrasting sharply with the two million tonnes used by the EU and UK for biofuels in the past year. Initial UN trade data for 2024 shows increased EU imports of palm waste byproduct, while the UK has not followed this trend. Researchers and industry experts interpret this discrepancy as further evidence of palm oil misuse linked to the rapid growth of European biofuel demand.

The Challenges of Verification and Transparency

A German agricultural expert and editor specializing in biofuels, said to the BBC that a significant proportion of the palm by-product used in HVO manufacturing is not genuine waste. Pure palm oil and its sediment possess identical chemical properties, making mislabeling easy. Since they derive from the same crops and share similar production sites, distinguishing between them is difficult without proper documentation.

Biofuel sustainability assessments rely on a certification process, primarily managed by ISCC (International Sustainability and Carbon Certification). ISCC has worked with authorities to track product origins and assure that recycled supplies used by fuel industries are legitimately sourced. However, monitoring these sources presents challenges in countries like Malaysia, China, and Indonesia, which are major sources of recycled materials for HVO companies. Due to regulatory limitations, ISCC cannot independently verify these records.

Image Credit - Freepik

ISCC’s Reliance on Local Partners and Concerns over Oversight

Dr. Bickert informed the BBC that ISCC relies on licensed Chinese verification specialists, noting that China’s prohibition on external audits presents a challenge in ensuring the integrity of the verification process. Several organizations voiced the same concern during the BBC’s investigation, highlighting the lack of transparency in certain regions.

Balfour Beatty, a major construction firm, has discontinued its use of HVO fuel due to concerns about its sustainability. Jo Gilroy, a representative of Balfour Beatty, expressed a lack of confidence in HVO sourcing to the BBC. The European Waste-based and Advanced Biofuels Association, representing leading European biofuel companies, has emphasized the urgent need to address verification discrepancies. The association is calling for strengthened measures from ISCC, demanding greater assurance that biodiesel from outside Europe adheres to the same regulations.

In response to growing fraud concerns, the Irish government has recently tightened restrictions on subsidies for oil produced from recycled palm materials. Meanwhile, reports suggest the EU is evaluating a potential multi-year ban on ISCC certification for recycled palm biofuels. As investigations continue, each member country must determine the validity of these certificates.

ISCC’s Response and the Future of Biofuel Certification

ISCC has expressed surprise at these developments, maintaining that it has pioneered robust methods for fraud detection and source verification for years. It argues that proposed regulatory actions would significantly disrupt the market.

The investigation into HVO fraud raises serious questions about the sustainability of the biofuel industry. The potential implications for climate change and deforestation are substantial. The outcome of the UK government's investigation, along with actions taken by the EU, will significantly impact the future of HVO and biofuel certification.

Palm Oil Deception: A Cancer in the Biofuel Industry?

One large biofuel producer described the influx of disguised palm oil using a stark analogy, calling it a "cancer" flooding the market. They felt forced to participate in the misrepresentation, pressured to mislabel raw ingredients to remain competitive. They used recycled ingredient claims despite knowing their falsehood.

The BBC’s investigation also unearthed another account from a former commodities dealer specializing in biofuels. This individual described a transaction involving alleged waste products, which he now believes were actually virgin palm oil shipments falsely categorized. He reported his suspicions to a corporate leader, who declined to investigate, fearing what an inquiry might uncover.

The Role of Certification and the ISCC

Biofuel sustainability relies on certification, which requires producers to disclose their raw material sources. ISCC, the International Sustainability and Carbon Certification, plays a key role in this process, working with authorities to track product origins and ensure legitimate sourcing of recycled supplies. In theory, this system provides assurance that fuel industries can confidently use recycled materials.

However, monitoring these sources presents difficulties in certain regions, such as Malaysia, China, and Indonesia. These nations represent significant sources of recycled materials for HVO producers. Regulatory constraints limit ISCC’s ability to verify records directly, and reliance on third-party verification raises concerns.

Challenges in Oversight and Enforcement

Dr. Bickert highlighted ISCC’s reliance on licensed Chinese verification specialists and pointed out China’s ban on external reviews, which creates difficulties in ensuring the integrity of the certification process. Other organizations echoed this concern, citing worries about the lack of transparency in certain regions. The absence of access for independent verification creates opportunities for misrepresentation.

The construction firm Balfour Beatty has stopped using HVO due to growing concerns regarding its sourcing and sustainability. Jo Gilroy, a Balfour Beatty representative, expressed this lack of confidence to the BBC.

Government Responses and Industry Reactions

The Irish government has taken action by recently limiting subsidies for oil derived from recycled palm materials, signaling growing recognition of fraud concerns in the biofuel market. The European Union is also considering action, including a potential ban on ISCC certification for recycled palm biofuels for several years. This would represent a significant step in addressing concerns about the integrity of current certification practices.

Investigations have yet to uncover verifiable records that disprove the dishonesty in renewable energy claims. Every involved member country faces a decision on whether to evaluate the validity of existing certificates.

Image Credit - Freepik

ISCC Defends Its Practices Amidst Criticism

ISCC responded to the allegations with surprise, asserting its pioneering role in fraud detection and source verification. The organization maintains that its system is rigorous and argues that proposed regulatory actions would disrupt the market unnecessarily. As both sides present their arguments, the investigation continues, and its outcome will significantly affect the biofuel industry.

The Complexities of Biofuel Certification and Sustainability

ISCC, a prominent certification body, aims to ensure the sustainability of biofuels through its key certification schemes, ISCC EU and ISCC PLUS. ISCC EU focuses on biofuels within the European Union and the UK, aligning with the European Renewable Energy Directive (RED II). ISCC PLUS serves the voluntary sustainability certification market, covering various sectors like plastics, chemicals, food, and feed.

Both schemes emphasize traceability, tracking raw materials throughout the supply chain to guarantee the sustainable origin of bio-based and circular materials. ISCC’s framework covers a broad range of feedstocks, including agricultural and forestry biomass, biogenic wastes, and recycled materials. ISCC works with licensed certifiers who conduct audits to verify compliance with its standards.

Scrutiny on Waste-Based Feedstocks and Fraud Concerns

The use of waste-based feedstocks in biofuel production has come under increased scrutiny, with critics questioning the true origin of these materials. Used cooking oil and palm oil byproducts are two common examples, and concerns exist regarding the potential mislabeling of virgin oils as recycled waste products. Such practices undermine the sustainability of biofuels and negate the environmental benefits these fuels claim to offer.

One report highlighted potential fraud within the palm oil byproduct market, indicating higher reported usage of palm oil residues than actual production allows. This discrepancy suggests fraudulent activities, likely involving the misrepresentation of palm oil as recycled waste. These findings raise doubts about the reliability of some so-called sustainable biofuels.

Environmental and Health Impacts of Biofuel Production

Despite their “green” image, biofuel production carries environmental and health risks. Studies suggest biofuel refineries release significant quantities of hazardous air pollutants, including formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and hexane. These substances present health hazards, with some posing carcinogenic risks, while others affect the central nervous system.

Biofuel production’s air pollution levels rival those of traditional oil refineries, and in some cases, exceed them for certain pollutants. Acrolein is one example—biofuel plants often represent the largest emitters of acrolein in affected areas. This chemical can cause respiratory problems, irritating the lungs and eyes.

These findings challenge the perception of biofuels as a clean alternative and raise questions about their overall environmental impact. The benefits of biofuels must be weighed against their potential harms.

The Importance of Independent Oversight and Enforcement

Effective oversight and enforcement are crucial for ensuring the sustainability of biofuels. Independent oversight bodies play a key role. They monitor compliance with environmental regulations and investigate allegations of fraud and misconduct. These bodies face various challenges. Limited resources and political opposition can hinder their effectiveness. Resistance from industry actors can create further obstacles. Strong regulatory frameworks are necessary. These frameworks must empower oversight agencies, granting them the authority to investigate and enforce regulations effectively. Transparent certification processes are essential. These processes must verify the origin and sustainability of feedstocks. This transparency helps prevent fraud and promotes accountability within the biofuel industry.

The Biofuel Tax Credit System: A Breeding Ground for Fraud?

The US biofuel industry benefits from a complex system of tax credits. These credits incentivize the production and use of biofuels. However, this system has also proven vulnerable to both legal exploitation and outright fraud. A 2024 report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) highlighted this vulnerability. The report detailed various instances of fraud related to biofuel tax credits, serving as a cautionary tale. It demonstrated how complex tax credit systems can be manipulated. Both legal loopholes and illegal schemes represent significant risks.

The Washakie Renewable Energy case exemplifies the scale of potential fraud. In 2023, operators of this company received prison sentences for their involvement in a massive $1 billion biofuel tax credit conspiracy. Over six years, the IRS paid out $511 billion in fraudulent tax credits and also prevented hundreds of billions more in fraudulent claims. The TIGTA report calls this "one of the largest fraud schemes in US history." This case is not an isolated incident. By 2017, over 30 individuals faced accusations of defrauding the IRS in biodiesel tax credit scams. A Colorado man received a guilty verdict for claiming $7 million in biodiesel tax credits, with fraudulent claims involving renewable fuel that never existed. Another scheme involved $100 million in fraudulent claims for biofuel tax credits.

Challenges in Enforcement and Oversight of Biofuel Credits

The complexity of biofuel tax credits hinders effective enforcement. TIGTA audits revealed a significant issue: one-third of audited taxpayers lacked proper documentation. Their biofuel credits should have been denied. However, the complexity of the system makes it difficult to identify and prosecute fraudulent claims. These credits also offer opportunities for legal exploitation.

A loophole once inflated the cost of a subsidy program more than twelvefold. This loophole stemmed from poorly defined terms in the alternative fuels credit, allowing oil industry lawyers to claim credits for standard gasoline production. Butane, an additive in gasoline, qualified as an alternative fuel, leading refiners to exploit the loophole by claiming credits for gasoline containing butane.

The EU's Biodiesel Market: A Target for Fraudulent Practices

The EU's biodiesel market also faces significant challenges related to fraud. A 2024 report highlighted how China exploited the EU's biofuel system. Since the beginning of 2023, fraudulent activity has escalated, particularly impacting the German biodiesel market and influencing rapeseed and grain prices. The complexity of the biofuel market creates opportunities for fraud.

The EU’s RED II Directive mandates increased biofuel use and reduced greenhouse gas emissions from transport. Member states have discretion in achieving these goals. Since January 2023, Germany, France, and other EU countries banned palm oil as a biodiesel feedstock. However, oil mills in palm oil-producing countries seek ways to circumvent this ban, utilizing China as a conduit. Palm oil or palm oil-derived HVO travels to China, where it undergoes hydrogenation or re-export before being falsely labeled as HVO from recycled palm oil or cooking oil mill wastewater (POME).

The Role of China in Biodiesel Fraud and Market Distortion

China plays a key role in this fraudulent activity. Lax regulations surrounding the re-declaration of goods facilitate this process. Millions of tonnes of HVO, biodiesel, and used cooking oil originate from China, often containing misrepresented palm oil. Palm oil, banned as a feedstock in many EU countries, finds its way into the European market through this deceptive practice.

This impacts the market, undercutting legitimate biofuel producers and distorting the true cost of decarbonization. Companies like BP and Shell purchase these deceptively labeled biofuels, allowing them to meet their GHG quota obligations at a lower cost. This reduces the amount of actual biofuel they need while enabling the use of more inexpensive mineral diesel. The volume of HVO allegedly derived from palm oil mill wastewater from China exceeds the actual production capacity of Indonesia and Malaysia, clearly suggesting fraud. The sudden influx of cheap advanced biodiesel from used cooking oil from China following Germany’s recognition of this feedstock also raises red flags. The involvement of China and the lack of traceability point to widespread fraud within the HVO market.

The EU's Struggle Against Biodiesel Fraud and Market Distortion

The European Commission confirmed an ongoing investigation targeting potential fraud related to sustainability certification for Chinese biofuels imported into the EU. This confirmation follows allegations from European biofuel producers claiming widespread fraud outside the EU, which harms the local market. Fraudulent biofuels count double or more toward blend targets due to inflated sustainability claims, undercutting legitimate EU producers.

The Commission collaborates with the complainant member state and certification bodies to determine the extent of the suspected fraud.

The Complexities of Biofuel Fraud and Certification

The fraud investigation runs separately from the anti-dumping investigation, which also targets Chinese biofuels. Provisional duties were recently announced in this case. The fraud investigation adds another layer of complexity, highlighting the difficulties in ensuring the sustainability of biofuels.

European producers allege widespread fraud relating to feedstocks, arguing that this damages the local market by facilitating the cheap supply of biofuels with inflated sustainability credentials. This undercuts EU producers and undermines efforts to promote genuine sustainable biofuels. The potential consequences of the fraud investigation remain unclear, as it represents a novel situation. The Commission has not previously investigated certification fraud on this scale.

Calls for Stronger Oversight and Enforcement of Biofuel Certification

Germany, France, and the Netherlands sent a letter to the Commission in May 2024 addressing the issue of fraudulent biofuels. These countries urged the Commission to intensify its anti-fraud efforts, improve governance schemes for biofuel sustainability, and implement mandatory on-site inspection access for EU and member state officials at biofuel producers outside the EU.

Increased oversight, they argue, would help prevent fraud and improve transparency and accountability. A key concern revolves around the certification process, as current regulations allow self-declaration for certain feedstocks. This system relies heavily on paper certificates, creating opportunities for fraud and making it difficult to verify the true origin of materials.

The Need for Traceability and Transparency in the Biofuel Supply Chain

The ongoing investigations highlight the need for stricter controls. The biofuel industry requires more robust certification procedures. Traceability and transparency are crucial, as consumers need assurance that biofuels meet sustainability criteria.

The current system’s vulnerabilities allow fraudulent actors to exploit loopholes, undermining the entire biofuel market and damaging the reputation of sustainable fuels. The EU faces the challenge of balancing its renewable energy goals with the need to prevent fraud. It must address the shortcomings of the current system and ensure the integrity of the biofuel market.

Effective enforcement of existing regulations remains critical. Increased oversight and stricter penalties for fraudulent activities could deter future misconduct. The outcomes of the ongoing investigations will significantly impact the biofuel industry, potentially leading to regulatory changes aimed at strengthening certification processes, preventing future fraud, and promoting the genuine sustainability of biofuels.