Deep Sea Mining Offers Riches But Risks Ocean Ecosystem Ruin

Depths of Despair or Towers of Treasure? The Deep-Sea Mining Dilemma Intensifies

Technological leaps bring the commercial use of the profound ocean terrain closer to reality, yet profound doubts and fierce opposition cast a long shadow over this emerging industry. The seabed, particularly in the vast, dark plains miles below the surface, holds immense quantities of potato-sized polymetallic nodules. These nodules contain nickel, cobalt, copper, and manganese – metals critical for renewable energy technologies and batteries, fuelling the green transition. However, the prospect of extracting them ignites a firestorm of controversy, primarily due to the potentially catastrophic and irreversible damage to largely unexplored and pristine marine ecosystems. The year 2025 looms as a pivotal moment, with international regulatory bodies and national governments facing crucial decisions that could determine the fate of these abyssal realms.

The Allure of Abyssal Riches

The deep sea, once considered a barren wasteland, now gains recognition as a reservoir of valuable minerals. Polymetallic nodules, cobalt-rich crusts, and polymetallic sulphides discovered near hydrothermal vents are the primary targets. Companies and some nations view these resources as a vital alternative to terrestrial mining, which carries its own significant environmental and social burdens. The Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ), a region within the Pacific spanning over 4.5 million square kilometres, is particularly rich; estimates suggest it holds over 21 billion tonnes of nodules. Proponents see this vast repository of metals as essential for meeting the escalating global demand driven by electric vehicles, solar panels, and wind turbines.

Technological Gambits for Seabed Harvest

Several companies pioneer distinct approaches to recover these deep-ocean minerals. Impossible Metals, a US-based startup, develops autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) designed for selective harvesting. Their robots employ AI and computer vision to identify nodules and, crucially, to detect and avoid visible marine life measuring one millimetre or more, aiming for a 95% accuracy rate. Oliver Gunasekara, the company’s chief executive, suggests this method, likened to using tweezers rather than a bulldozer, could significantly reduce the environmental footprint compared to traditional dredging. The untethered, hovering robots aim to produce fewer sediment plumes and less noise. Impossible Metals envisions fleets of these bots delivering nodules to a surface vessel for transport to land-based processing.

Alternative Collection Strategies

Other players pursue different methodologies. The Metals Company (TMC), collaborating with Swiss-based Allseas, has engineered a system to scoop nodules from the ocean bottom and pump them through a riser pipe to a surface support ship. Allseas' vessel, the Hidden Gem, conducted trials in 2022, successfully collecting upwards of 3,000 metric tons of mineral-rich stones from over 4 kilometres deep in the CCZ. This marked the first integrated collection test since the 1970s. Seabed Solutions, a Norwegian firm, develops a cutting implement to retrieve layers containing minerals, stating they attempt to limit sediment disruption by encasing the operational zone and employing suction. Jovana Jovanova, who works at Delft University of Technology, also researches robotic arm systems, stressing that technology should be developed in harmony with the environment.

Lingering Scars and Lessons from the Past

Apprehension surrounding activities to mine the deep sea is not without historical precedent. Mining experiments undertaken decades ago, using cruder methods that caused extensive disturbance, left severe and lasting marks on the ocean floor. Researchers point to tracks created by equipment within a specific area of the Pacific Ocean’s bed in 1979 that remain visible today. Reports indicate that wildlife in that area has not fully recovered even after more than forty years, a stark warning of the potential for long-term ecological damage. Similarly, tests on the Blake Plateau off the US East Coast in 1970 left barren areas that have shown little recovery half a century later, underscoring the fragility of these deep-sea environments.

Image Credit - BBC

The Weight of Environmental Concerns

Environmental organisations and many scientists express grave reservations. Jessica Battle from the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) argues that the act of mining, by its very nature, will remove the substrate essential for life within and upon the profound seafloor, irrespective of the technology employed. The abyssal plain remains largely untouched and poorly understood, leading many, like John Childs from Lancaster University, to advocate for leaving it undisturbed until more comprehensive knowledge is available. Concerns focus on irreversible biodiversity loss, the destruction of unique habitats, sediment plumes that can smother life far from the extraction zone, noise pollution affecting marine mammals, and the release of toxic metals.

Biodiversity Hotspots Under Threat

Recent scientific discoveries continue to highlight the extraordinary biodiversity of the deep ocean, including in zones targeted for mineral extraction. In May 2023, scientists revealed the discovery of more than 5,000 new species within the Clarion-Clipperton Zone. Many of these organisms, including corals and sponges, grow directly upon the polymetallic nodules themselves or live in the surrounding sediment. Ann Vanreusel, affiliated with Ghent University, emphasises that the nodules are not just rocks but a living foundation; their removal would inevitably affect the ecosystem, even with minimal sediment disturbance or noise. The unique life-history strategies of many deep-sea species mean recovery from disturbance could take centuries, if it occurs at all, leading to a net loss of biodiversity.

Sediment Plumes and Their Pervasive Impact

A significant concern is the creation of sediment plumes. Mining activities will inevitably stir up fine clay-like sediments on the seafloor. These plumes can drift for considerable distances, potentially smothering benthic organisms, clogging filtering apparatuses of deep-sea creatures, and altering the chemical environment. The Metals Company suggests their tests indicate plumes might travel for hundreds of metres, not many kilometres, with sediment gradually clearing. However, critics remain sceptical, fearing widespread dispersal. Allseas reports adjusting waterjet force to restrict sediment agitation and considers deeper re-injection of sediment returned from the upper water column, although this may be energy-intensive.

Noise, Light, and Chemical Pollution

Beyond sediment plumes, deep-sea mining operations will introduce noise and light into environments that are naturally dark and quiet. Noise from machinery has the potential to disrupt the communication, navigation, and predator-prey detection of marine animals, particularly cetaceans. Light pollution can disturb natural behaviours. There are also concerns about the potential release of toxic metals and other pollutants from disturbed sediments or from the nodules themselves, which could enter the marine food web with unknown consequences. The cumulative impact of these various stressors on already vulnerable deep-sea ecosystems is a major point of contention.

The Unfolding Regulatory Maze

Currently, no commercial ventures to mine the deep sea are operational. However, this could change if the International Seabed Authority (ISA), the UN body responsible for regulating mineral-related activities in international waters, finalises and publishes an initial body of exploitation regulations. The ISA has already granted numerous exploration contracts. Negotiations for a "Mining Code" are complex and ongoing, covering environmental protection, benefit-sharing, oversight, and liability. The ISA Council aims to finalise this code during its 30th session in 2025. Leticia Carvalho, the new ISA Secretary-General appointed in 2025, may signal a shift towards greater environmental consideration.

Image Credit - BBC

A Divided International Community

The international community is deeply split on the issue. An expanding group of more than 30 countries, including France, Germany, Spain, New Zealand, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Chile, advocates for a precautionary pause, a temporary halt, or an outright prohibition on extracting resources from the deep sea until more scientific knowledge is available and effective protection measures can be assured. France declared its support for a ban in November 2022. Portugal recently passed a law halting such mining in its waters until 2050 and committed to advocating for an international ban. Conversely, some nations, including China, Japan, Russia, South Korea, and Norway, along with some small island states like Nauru and Tonga, see economic and strategic benefits and favour rapid exploitation.

Corporate Ambitions and Controversies

Companies such as The Metals Company (TMC) remain bullish. Gerard Barron, TMC's chief executive, dismisses appeals for a temporary halt as "virtue signalling." TMC plans to submit an exploitation request concerning the Pacific Ocean to the ISA in late 2025, potentially pressuring the regulator. The company has encountered public objections and legal actions, including a collective proceeding by financiers over financial reporting, which Barron dismisses as baseless. Adding another layer of complexity, TMC recently announced its US subsidiary initiated a request for a US mining licence, potentially bypassing the ISA framework. This move has been met with concern by the ISA Secretary-General, who emphasised that unilateral actions could violate international law.

The United States' Shifting Stance

The United States presents a unique case. It has not ratified the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and therefore lacks voting rights at the ISA, though it has respected the treaty as customary international law. Historically, NOAA granted exploration licences in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone in 1984, before UNCLOS entered into force, some of which remain dormant. In April 2025, a significant development occurred when then-President Donald Trump signed an executive order to fast-track deep-sea mineral extraction, aiming to reduce reliance on China for critical minerals. This move signals a renewed US interest in seabed resources, potentially setting up conflicts with the international framework governed by the ISA.

China's Dominant Deep-Sea Presence

China is a major player in the deep-sea mining arena. It holds the highest number of ISA exploration contracts (five out of 31) and actively develops exploration and extraction technologies. Beijing is a significant funder of the ISA and heavily involved in its proceedings, positioning itself to shape future regulations. Furthermore, China pursues bilateral agreements with Pacific Island nations, such as the Cook Islands, for collaboration in researching and potentially extracting seabed minerals, raising geopolitical concerns among other regional powers. This strategy aims to secure access to critical resources and expand its influence in the global minerals market.

Indigenous Rights and Cultural Heritage

Extracting minerals from the deep sea raises significant concerns for Indigenous peoples and local communities, especially within the Pacific region. Numerous Indigenous traditions hold deep spiritual and ancestral connections with the ocean, and mining activities could disturb sacred sites and traditional livelihoods. The Alliance of Solwara Warriors in Papua New Guinea, for instance, calls the deep-sea environment the "common heritage of mankind" and demands a permanent ban, fearing that governments prioritise profit over people's well-being and Indigenous ways of life. There are calls for meaningful participation of Indigenous peoples in environmental impact assessments and decision-making processes, incorporating traditional knowledge.

Economic Uncertainties and Volatile Markets

Beyond the environmental and ethical dilemmas, the economic viability of deep-sea mining remains uncertain. Lea Reitmeier, associated with the London School of Economics, indicates that the commercial arena for metals that deep-sea mining firms seek is characteristically unpredictable. Price fluctuations for commodities like nickel, cobalt, and manganese could undermine the financial rationale for such capital-intensive ventures. Questions persist about whether actual supply shortages for all these minerals truly justify embarking on such a high-risk industry. The significant upfront investment and unproven long-term profitability pose considerable financial risks for companies and investors.

Image Credit - BBC

The Quest for Alternatives

Instead of rushing into deep-sea exploitation, many argue for intensified efforts in more sustainable solutions. These include significantly improving recycling rates for existing metals, promoting "urban mining" to recover valuable materials from e-waste and industrial scrap, and investing in research and development of alternative materials for batteries and renewable energy technologies. Innovations in battery chemistry, such as sodium-ion batteries, could reduce reliance on metals like cobalt and nickel. Strengthening land-based mining practices to minimise their environmental impact is also considered a crucial parallel strategy. Some major companies, including BMW, Volkswagen, Volvo, Google, and Samsung, have pledged not to use seabed minerals for now, adding pressure against deep-sea mineral extraction.

A Pivotal Moment for Ocean Governance

The coming months and years are critical for the future of the profound marine environment. The International Seabed Authority confronts the immense challenge of finalising a Mining Code that genuinely protects the marine environment while addressing the principle of the common heritage of humankind. The decisions made will have profound and lasting consequences for the planet's largest and least understood biome. Appeals for a temporary suspension or a precautionary delay continue to grow, supported by an increasing number of nations, scientists, and civil society organisations who urge caution over commercial exploitation.

The Argument for Caution Prevails

Many experts argue that until the deep-sea ecosystems are far better understood and the full impacts of mining can be reliably predicted and mitigated, a precautionary approach is essential. The potential for irreversible and widespread environmental damage, coupled with the unknown long-term consequences for global ocean health and climate regulation, suggests that opening this new industrial frontier may be a gamble humanity cannot afford to lose. The focus, many contend, should remain on scientific research and the pursuit of less damaging alternatives to meet resource needs. The deep sea's fate hangs in the balance, caught between the drive for resources and the imperative for conservation.