Schools Silence Race and Faith Talk

Classrooms fall silent: Students afraid to speak on ethnicity and belief

A landmark study reveals a chilling silence in British schools, where pupils from ethnic and religious minority communities feel unable to discuss equality. New research shows these young people frequently censor themselves on matters concerning race and faith, fearing judgment or misunderstanding. This self-censorship stems from a complex mix of factors within the educational environment, creating a barrier to open and honest dialogue when it is needed most.

The findings from a report recently published by the University of Birmingham illustrate a troubling situation regarding expression in England's schools. Researchers suggest a heightened and often inflammatory political climate surrounding these topics discourages open conversation. Funding for the investigation came from the Leverhulme Trust, with the project seeking to determine how schools support or constrain a young person’s capacity for discussing these vital societal subjects. It highlights a critical gap between the principle of free speech in policy and the reality of student experience.

This comprehensive investigation—‘Free’ expression at school? The making of youth engagements with race and faith’—is the first to systematically chart the multitude of influences shaping how teenagers navigate these sensitive discussions. The work provides a vital snapshot of the school environment's impact on a young person's freedom to articulate their views on racial and spiritual fairness, revealing a system where many feel their voices are not welcome or safe.

A Deep and Detailed Investigation

To construct their analysis, researchers embarked on substantial fieldwork across England. The project fused numerical data with personal accounts to create a detailed map of the challenges. A cornerstone of the research involved a survey distributed within schools that collected views from 3,156 pupils in Year 10, providing a rare and large-scale insight into the thoughts of 14- and 15-year-olds. This survey spanned eight out of nine of the country's regions, ensuring a broad geographical scope.

The research team, which featured Dr Md Shajedur Rahman and Dr Aslı Kandemir, also carried out detailed case studies in diverse school settings, including London and Birmingham. These case studies involved 246 lesson observations, interviews with 47 teachers, and innovative "photovoice" activities in which adolescents used images to express their perspectives. This multi-layered approach allowed for a rich and nuanced understanding of how expression is formed and limited within the educational framework.

Further context came from interviews with policymakers and influential figures at both national and local levels. The team also surveyed 214 teachers and analysed ninety-eight official education policy documents. This comprehensive methodology ensures the findings are grounded in a wide array of evidence, capturing the complex interplay between policy, school environment, and the individual encounters of adolescents from minoritised communities.

Image Credit - Freepik

The Political Climate and School Life

A key aspect of the study explores the chilling effect of political discourse on classroom conversations. Professor Karl Kitching, who guided the investigation, noted that a narrative suggesting free speech is ‘at risk’ due to anti-racist movements has become prominent in public debate. However, he points out that little focus has been directed toward the way adolescents themselves experience this pressurised environment. The research suggests that this political heat may be a primary reason for student self-censorship.

The government has simultaneously cautioned schools about engaging with certain equality issues while offering little in the way of meaningful support to navigate these complex topics. This contradiction leaves schools in a difficult position, often managing sensitive global issues like the conflict in Israel-Palestine without adequate resources or guidance. The study argues for a shift away from top-down mandates, such as recent political impartiality guidelines, toward a more supportive, youth-led approach.

This policy environment has real-world consequences. Researchers found that inflammatory discourse over the last ten years has discredited scientific proof of institutional racism within education. This, in turn, negatively impacts how political impartiality is handled and influences which societal topics get classified as 'contested' or too controversial for the classroom. The result is a system that often avoids the very conversations that students need to have.

A Reluctance to Speak Out

One of the most troubling findings is the widespread reluctance among adolescents from minoritised backgrounds to discuss their own encounters with prejudice with teachers. Many also choose not to voice their broader societal and political perspectives within the school setting. This silence is not necessarily a sign of passivity or a lack of opinion, but rather a calculated act of self-preservation in an environment they perceive as unsupportive or even hostile.

Students reported several reasons for censoring themselves. These included a fear that their experiences would not be heard or believed, that they might cause offence or be judged by their peers, or even that they could be disciplined for being 'too political'. This demonstrates a significant breakdown of trust between these students and the educational structure that is supposed to support their development as active and engaged citizens.

The study also uncovers how what young people hope school will be as a forum for political learning can vary. These differences are connected in part to their social standing and a student's expected level of academic achievement. This suggests that a young person's background can significantly shape their perceived ability to engage in these crucial dialogues, creating further layers of inequality within the educational experience and limiting opportunities for civic learning.

An Inadequate and Unrepresentative Curriculum

The research highlights profound dissatisfaction with the curriculum among students from minoritised backgrounds. The odds of Black and Asian adolescents disagreeing that their own community's history is depicted truthfully in lessons were at least 2.5 times greater. This finding points to a curriculum that many students feel fails to reflect their own identities and the diverse fabric of British society.

This issue is not confined to history. A 2024 report from the Runnymede Trust on art education found a significant under-representation of minority ethnic artists in curriculum materials. Only 2.3% of artists referenced in GCSE Art exam papers were from Black or South Asian backgrounds. Campaign groups like The Black Curriculum have long argued that the current national curriculum presents a predominantly Eurocentric narrative, systematically omitting the contributions of Black Britons.

Teachers themselves recognise the problem. Within the Birmingham University investigation, only 23% of teachers surveyed felt the current examinations system enabled them to properly teach regarding fairness on matters of ethnicity and belief. Many see the rigid assessment and exams system as a major barrier to diversifying the curriculum, particularly at Key Stage 4. This structural limitation prevents educators from providing the rich, representative education that students are asking for.

Image Credit - Freepik

The Influence of Geography and Social Class

Where a young person lives significantly impacts their opportunity to engage with political subjects inside the classroom. The research discovered a clear geographical disparity, with countryside schools viewed as less inclined to encourage open discussion on these topics compared to their urban counterparts. This finding aligns with broader analyses of geographic inequality in UK education, which show that opportunities and outcomes are often concentrated in London and other urban centres.

Social class also plays a crucial role. The study indicates how minoritised students perceive school's function as a forum for political learning is connected to their social standing and academic trajectory. This intersects with geography, as poorer white pupils outside of London are often located in areas with multidimensional disadvantages, including lower social mobility. Such disparities create an uneven landscape for civic education across the country.

The "London effect" is a documented phenomenon where disadvantaged pupils in the capital often achieve better outcomes than their peers elsewhere. The Birmingham University investigation suggests a similar dynamic may be at play regarding classroom discourse. Urban schools, often more ethnically diverse, may have more practice and resources for facilitating these conversations, leaving students in less diverse, rural, or "left-behind" areas without the same opportunities for engagement.

A Turn to Social Media

With classroom conversations often stifled, adolescents are turning elsewhere to learn and talk about the world. An overwhelming three-quarters of pupils who responded reported that digital platforms are their main source of information on societal and political topics. Their closest relations and peers remain the ones they are most at ease speaking with, highlighting a clear preference for informal, trusted networks over the formal school environment for these critical discussions.

This reliance on digital platforms presents a complex picture. On one hand, social media offers accessible, real-time information and allows adolescents to connect with global movements and diverse perspectives. Hashtags can amplify messages and create a sense of community, empowering youth to organise and share their views. However, this digital sphere is also fraught with challenges, including the prevalence of misinformation, algorithm-driven echo chambers, and online aggression.

The shift away from the classroom for political learning carries significant risks. While social media can be a powerful tool for activism, it lacks the structured, evidence-based dialogue that schools should provide. The Birmingham University investigation stresses the need for deep learning and dialogue in schools to build a strong democracy and foster trust between different social groups, a need that is currently not being met.

The Counterintuitive Power of Difficult Conversations

A central argument against introducing certain social topics in schools is that they are inherently divisive and shut down debate. The Birmingham University research, however, directly refutes this idea concerning movements like Black Lives Matter. The findings demonstrate that schools actively engaging with social movements and "controversial" topics have a much greater tendency to foster an environment of genuine free expression and critical thinking. This creates a more open, rather than closed, atmosphere for discussion.

The data is compelling. For instance, when the Black Lives Matter movement was a topic of conversation, the adolescents who responded were three and a half times more inclined to state that their educators prompted them to voice their own views. They were also more than twice as likely to report that teachers present multiple perspectives. A similar pattern emerged when discussions included the concept of White privilege, with pupils indicating they felt a greater sense of encouragement to offer their perspectives and form their own conclusions.

Conversely, schools that avoid these topics are less inclined to employ educators who model good debate by presenting various viewpoints or listening to student opinions. This indicates that avoiding difficult subjects does not create neutrality; it creates a vacuum. Addressing prejudice based on race or belief through the curriculum itself, not just through behaviour policies, is shown to be a more effective strategy for building trust and confidence among pupils.

Image Credit - Freepik

The Shadow of Government Policy

Statutory guidance on political impartiality in schools is intended to ensure balanced teaching. The Department for Education (DfE) requires schools to prohibit the promotion of "partisan political views" and to ensure opposing viewpoints are presented fairly. However, the interpretation and application of this guidance in a politically charged climate has created significant challenges for educators, contributing to the culture of silence.

The guidance itself is complex. It notes that "partisan" is not limited to political parties but can include views held by campaign groups. While teaching about social campaigns, including the Black Lives Matter movement, is permitted, schools are advised that this may involve partisan views that go beyond the shared principle that racism is unacceptable. This places teachers in a difficult position, requiring them to navigate nuanced distinctions under the threat of scrutiny.

Furthermore, the government’s Prevent duty, introduced in 2015 to counter extremism, has also had a chilling effect. Critics argue the policy has been interpreted through an Islamophobic lens, creating suspicion around Muslim students and discouraging open discussions about faith and global politics. Research shows Muslim women in education particularly feel the impact, leading to self-censorship to avoid being perceived as a "visible Other." This web of policy creates an intimidating environment where authentic dialogue is stifled.

The Impact on Teachers

Teachers find themselves at the sharp end of these conflicting pressures. They must navigate complex statutory duties on impartiality and safeguarding while facing criticism from a polarised public debate. The Birmingham University investigation found that many teachers feel ill-equipped and unsupported in facilitating these essential conversations, particularly with the constraints of an exam-focused curriculum. This lack of support contributes to the avoidance of sensitive topics in the classroom.

The Runnymede Trust has also highlighted the significant lack of racial diversity within the teaching workforce itself. Research shows that 46% of educational institutions throughout England lack a single teacher from a minority ethnic background, despite a third of pupils coming from these communities. This absence of role models can reinforce feelings of alienation among minoritised students and means that the burden of raising these issues often falls on a small number of educators.

Moreover, teachers express a need for better training to handle these subjects confidently. One inquiry found that a quarter of teachers lacked confidence in developing pupils' understanding of black history and cultural diversity, with 86% calling for specialised training. Without the confidence, training, and institutional backing to navigate controversial issues, many educators default to the safest option: silence. This leaves students without the guidance they need to process complex societal problems.

The Lived Experience of Racism in Schools

The reluctance of students to speak is rooted in tangible experiences of inequality. Studies and reports consistently show that racism remains deeply embedded in the schooling system. This is evident in everything from disproportionate exclusion rates to microaggressions in the classroom. Black Caribbean pupils are consistently over three times as prone to being excluded than their white peers, a statistic that points to systemic issues rather than individual behaviour.

Students report incidents such as teachers repeatedly mispronouncing their names or mixing them up with other pupils from the same ethnic group. While seemingly minor, these actions contribute to a feeling of being unmemorable and devalued, affecting their sense of belonging and even their subject choices. Uniform policies, particularly around hairstyles, have also been criticised for being indirectly discriminatory against black students.

These experiences are not isolated. A Runnymede Trust report found that 49% of young black people believe racism in school is the biggest barrier to their educational success. When students do not feel seen, respected, or safe, they are unlikely to view the classroom as a forum for open expression. The silence identified in the Birmingham study is a direct consequence of this lived reality of racial inequality.

Image Credit - Freepik

Inequity in Educational Outcomes

The issues of curriculum, classroom environment, and teacher diversity are directly connected to broader patterns of educational inequality. While government data shows that many ethnic minority groups have high rates of entry into higher education, this masks a more complex picture of achievement and opportunity. For example, all major ethnic minority groups have a lower probability than their white peers of receiving a first-class or 2:1 degree.

Attainment gaps are persistent and often stark. At GCSE level, the average scores for Black Caribbean and Mixed White and Black Caribbean pupils remain significantly lower than for their White British peers. While some of this is linked to socio-economic factors, analysis shows that these gaps remain even after accounting for poverty. This suggests that factors within the educational framework itself contribute to these unequal outcomes.

Furthermore, the way attainment is measured can itself widen these gaps. Experts have shown that changes to performance metrics, like the introduction of the English Baccalaureate, have had a disproportionate detrimental effect on Black Caribbean students. The educational journey for many minoritised students is fraught with systemic hurdles that cannot be explained away by external factors alone, pointing back to the need for deep reform within schools.

Forging a Path Forward: Key Recommendations

The Birmingham University study finishes by proposing six distinct policy suggestions to tackle the inequalities it uncovers. A primary call is for a fundamental update that affects both the country's curriculum and the frameworks for student evaluation and institutional review governing schools. This involves embedding diverse histories and perspectives in a meaningful way, moving beyond tokenistic gestures and addressing the structural barriers identified by teachers.

Another key proposal is to improve the systems for reporting instances of racial or religious prejudice in schools. Building trust with pupils requires demonstrating that their concerns are taken seriously and that there are robust mechanisms for addressing discrimination. When students believe their school will deal with racism effectively, they have a much greater tendency to feel safe and confident. This fosters a more positive and inclusive school culture.

Giving educational institutions and their staff the tools to handle diverse perspectives is also critical. This means moving beyond vague impartiality guidelines and providing educators with concrete support, training, and resources to manage difficult conversations constructively. This empowerment is not about promoting one viewpoint but about equipping teachers with the skills to foster critical thinking and respectful debate among their students.

Empowering Student Voice for a Stronger Democracy

Ultimately, the research underscores a fundamental truth: a healthy democracy requires citizens who feel their voice matters. The study's findings are particularly urgent given ongoing proposals for lowering the age for voting to sixteen. If young people learn in school that their experiences are invalid and their opinions on crucial issues are unwelcome, it undermines their faith in democratic systems and their own agency.

Professor Kitching offered a concluding thought that policy must actively work to cultivate confidence among adolescents. This involves showing them the central importance placed upon anti-racism within the educational sector. It also requires demonstrating that their perspectives are valued not as a problem to be managed, but as an essential part of their civic education and the broader social dialogue. Schools must become places that nurture, not silence, the next generation of engaged citizens.

The challenge is to transform schools into environments where every young person believes that the difficulties they face can be resolved. This requires systemic change, from the content of the curriculum to the culture in the classroom. By fostering genuine opportunities for expression and dialogue on topics of ethnicity and belief, the educational framework can begin to repair broken trust and fulfill its promise of preparing all students for life in a diverse and complex world.