Hungary Law Stirs EU Outrage

Hungary's LGBTQ+ Restrictions Face Mounting EU Condemnation

A controversial Hungarian law, widely criticised for curtailing LGBTQ+ rights under the guise of child protection, faces escalating scrutiny and legal challenges within the European Union. Top EU legal figures and numerous member states argue the legislation fundamentally breaches European values and human rights principles.

Contentious Law Sparks EU Legal Action

Hungary enacted Act LXXIX of 2021. This law was ostensibly designed for "tougher action against paedophile offenders and amending certain laws to protect children". However, amendments introduced by the ruling Fidesz party significantly altered its scope. These changes prohibit the portrayal or "promotion" of homosexuality and gender transition to individuals under eighteen. This restriction extends to school educational materials, television programmes, films, and advertisements broadcast before a late-evening watershed. The European Commission initiated infringement proceedings against Hungary shortly after the law’s passage in July 2021. The Commission contends the law violates EU treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. This legal challenge has garnered support from numerous EU member states and the European Parliament. It is evolving into a significant human rights case.

Advocate General Delivers Damning Opinion

Tamara Ćapeta, an Advocate General for the justice tribunal of Europe, recently delivered a non-binding opinion. This opinion comprehensively dismantled the justifications offered by authorities in Hungary for the law. She asserted the legislation contravenes essential human entitlements and the liberty of self-expression. Ćapeta found the legal measure did not rely on any factual, scientific backing. Instead, it originated from a subjective moral stance. She further endorsed a perspective the European parliamentary body put before the tribunal.

This perspective described the law as a form of bias. This bias suggested that homosexual and transgender individuals' lives possess inferior worth or position relative to the lives of heterosexual and cisgender persons. Her assessment concluded that, contrary to safeguarding young individuals from negative impacts, this particular set of rules actually magnifies those detrimental outcomes. Advocate General opinions often foreshadow the ECJ's final rulings. These typically follow within months. If the court confirms the law's unlawfulness, Hungary could face substantial fines. The nation might also be compelled to repeal the contentious provisions.

Restrictions Likened to Russian "Gay Propaganda" Law

Critics frequently compare the legal measures from Hungary to Russia's 2013 "gay propaganda law". Both laws ostensibly aim to protect children. However, they effectively limit information and discussion about LGBTQ+ issues. The Russian law has faced international condemnation for fostering discrimination and violence against LGBTQ+ individuals. Human rights organisations, including Amnesty International, argue that Hungary's law similarly curtails freedom of expression. They state it has created a "cloud of fear". These organisations also assert it entrenches negative stereotypes and restricts access to essential information, particularly for young people. The vague wording concerning the "depiction and promotion" of diverse gender identities and sexual orientations has bred uncertainty. Fear has spread among those in media, advertising, and publishing.

Impact on Media and Education

The Hungarian law directly impacts media content and educational programmes. Television shows, films, and advertisements featuring LGBTQ+ themes or individuals face restricted broadcast times. These are typically after 10 pm. Booksellers must seal books with LGBTQ+ content. They cannot display them near schools or churches. Krisztián Nyáry, a creative director at a publishing company, spoke about the uncertainty and potential penalties. Law-abiding booksellers and publishers face these. In schools, the law prohibits the inclusion of LGBTQ+ topics in educational materials. Sex education classes are also affected. These can now only be taught by government-approved instructors. Some teachers have expressed their intent to defy these restrictions. They view them as harmful to young people.

Image Credit - Freepik

Hungarian Government Defends "Child Protection" Stance

The administration in Hungary, led by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, vehemently defends the law. They describe it as a necessary measure for child protection. Balázs Hankó, who serves as the minister for culture and innovation in Hungary, asserted that "sexual propaganda" should not take precedence over safeguarding children. He stated that responsibility for sexual instruction lies with parents, not with individuals promoting gender ideologies or with persuasive campaigns. The government argues it has the right to protect children from content it deems inappropriate. It also aims to uphold traditional family values. Officials maintain the law aims to shield minors from exposure to homosexuality and gender change. They frame these as potentially harmful to their development. This narrative has been a consistent theme in Fidesz's social policy.

Erosion of Fundamental Rights Alleged

The Advocate General’s opinion highlighted that the Hungarian law infringes upon several fundamental rights protected by the EU Charter. These include the prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation, respect for private and family life, the liberty of self-expression and information, and the right to human dignity. Ćapeta argued that the law's stigmatising effects create hostility towards LGBTI individuals. This negatively impacts their sense of identity, personal worth, and assurance. She specifically noted the detrimental effect on LGBTI minors. They are prevented from realising their lives are not abnormal when details regarding LGBTI existence are eliminated from common discourse. This, she concluded, impacts how their contemporaries accept them and their entitlement to a 'personal social existence'.

Broader EU Concerns Over Rule of Law

The controversy surrounding the LGBTQ+ content law is part of wider EU concerns regarding the rule of law in Hungary. The European Commission has clashed with Budapest over various issues. These include judicial independence, media freedom, and corruption. These concerns have led to the withholding of substantial EU funds from Hungary. The EU institutions are scrutinising Hungary's adherence to Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). This article enshrines fundamental values like human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, and respect for human rights, including minority rights. Ćapeta’s opinion suggested the ECJ should find a self-standing infringement of Article 2 TEU. She stated Hungary has "significantly deviated from the model of a constitutional democracy".

Expansion of Restrictions: Pride Bans and Surveillance

Hungary has further intensified its restrictive efforts concerning LGBTQ+ entitlements. In March 2025, the Hungarian parliament adopted legislation restricting freedom of assembly. This effectively banned Pride marches. This new law links to the 2021 "child protection" act. It prohibits public events that portray "divergence from self-identity corresponding to sex at birth, sex change or homosexuality". Concurrently, authorities received authorisation to employ facial identification systems. They can use these to identify and potentially fine participants in such events. These measures have drawn further condemnation from international bodies and EU member states. They view them as a severe infringement on the rights to peaceful assembly and privacy. The UN Human Rights spokesperson expressed deep concern over these developments.

International Condemnation and Calls for Action

The Hungarian law and subsequent measures have elicited widespread international condemnation. Numerous European Union constituent nations, among them Germany and France, have publicly criticised Hungary's stance. In May 2025, twenty EU member states signed a declaration. They expressed deep concern over the legislative and constitutional amendments in Hungary that infringe on the essential entitlements for LGBTIQ+ individuals. They urged Hungary to amend these policies. They also called on the EU's executive body to employ its rule of law toolbox. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International consistently campaign against these laws. They highlight their discriminatory nature and negative impact. These organisations, along with ILGA-Europe, advocate for the repeal of the laws and for robust EU action.

Image Credit - Freepik

Domestic Resistance and Public Opinion

Despite the government's rhetoric, there is evidence of domestic resistance and evolving public opinion in Hungary. Following the 2021 law, thousands protested in Budapest. Organisers of Budapest Pride have remained defiant despite the recent ban. They vow to proceed with events. Some teachers have also indicated they will not comply with classroom restrictions. Interestingly, surveys suggest that public support for the LGBTQ+ community in Hungary may be growing, despite the government's policies. An IPSOS 2023 survey showed increased support for same-sex marriage and adoption by same-sex couples in Hungary over the past decade. A 2021 Amnesty International survey also found a majority of Hungarians disagreed with the government's assertion that gay people harm children.

Legal Proceedings and Potential Consequences

The European Commission referred Hungary to the ECJ in July 2022 over the 2021 law. The case, C-769/22, involves arguments that Hungary breached EU directives on services, audiovisual media, and e-commerce. It also covers breaches of fundamental EU values. A coalition of sixteen constituent nations along with the European parliamentary body have aligned with the EU executive's legal action. This marks it as a significant human rights legal battle. If the ECJ rules against Hungary, as Advocate General Ćapeta's opinion suggests it should, the country could face substantial financial penalties. The court could also mandate the repeal or amendment of the disputed statutes. Such a ruling would significantly bolster the EU's stance on protecting fundamental rights within its member states.

The "Child Protection" Narrative Scrutinised

Authorities in Hungary consistently frame its restrictive laws as measures to protect children. However, critics argue this narrative is a pretext to target LGBTQ+ individuals and conflate homosexuality with paedophilia. The 2021 law was titled an act for "tougher action against paedophile offenders," yet its most controversial amendments centered on material related to LGBTQ+ individuals. The Venice Commission, an advisory body of the Council of Europe, found in December 2021 that the statute was at odds with the European human rights agreement. Advocate General Ćapeta also rejected the child protection justification. She noted the law prohibits portrayals of ordinary LGBTQ+ lives, not just pornography, which was already illegal.

Image Credit - Freepik

Constitutional Amendments Solidify Stance

Recent constitutional amendments in Hungary further entrench the government's position. An amendment passed in April 2025 codifies the prohibition of Pride gatherings. It also grants officials permission to employ facial identification systems to track attendees for potential fines. The constitution now also states that it recognises only two sexes, male and female. This expands on an earlier amendment that defined marriage as between a man and a woman. It effectively banned same-sex adoption. These constitutional changes aim to provide a legal basis for denying the gender identities of transgender people and ignoring intersex individuals. Legal scholars and critics view these amendments as further steps towards authoritarianism.

EU's "Nuclear Option" and Funding Freezes

The ongoing disputes over LGBTQ+ rights and the broader rule of law have strained Hungary's relationship with the EU. There is increasing discussion among EU diplomats about deploying the "nuclear option" – Article 7 proceedings. This could ultimately strip Hungary of its voting rights in the European Council. This requires a four-fifths majority of EU countries to first determine a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. This is followed by a unanimous vote (excluding Hungary) to impose sanctions like suspending voting rights. The EU has already withheld billions in cohesion funds and pandemic recovery money from Hungary. This is due to rule-of-law concerns, adding financial pressure on Orbán's government.

Broader Implications for European Values

The situation in Hungary raises profound questions about the EU's ability to uphold its foundational values among member states. The case tests the bloc's commitment to democracy, human rights, and non-discrimination. The European Parliament has declared the EU an "LGBTIQ Freedom Zone". This was in response to regressive measures in countries like Hungary and Poland. The outcome of the ECJ case and the EU's broader response will have significant implications. It will affect the future of LGBTQ+ rights and the rule of law across the Union. It underscores the ongoing tension between national sovereignty claims and the supranational commitment to shared European principles.

Image Credit - Freepik

Romania Considers Similar Legislation

The trend of restrictive legislation is not confined to Hungary or Russia. In 2022, reports indicated that Romania was considering a bill similar to Hungary's. It aimed at banning so-called "gay propaganda" in schools and public life. This bill was initiated by lawmakers from an ethnic Hungarian party within Romania's ruling coalition. It also used the pretext of child protection. This development caused concern among MEPs and rights groups. They warned of its resemblance to the Hungarian and Russian laws. They also highlighted its potential to fuel disinformation and reinstate censorship. Such legislative moves highlight a worrying pattern in parts of Eastern and Central Europe regarding LGBTQ+ rights.

The Stigmatising Effect on Youth

A primary concern voiced by human rights advocates and health professionals is the detrimental impact of these laws on LGBTQ+ youth. Prohibiting access to objective information and positive portrayals of LGBTQ+ lives can lead to feelings of isolation, shame, and confusion. Young people questioning their identity experience this. Medical professionals have warned that growing up in a hostile, discriminatory environment significantly increases the risk of mental health issues. These include depression and self-harm among LGBTQ+ adolescents. The laws effectively deny these young individuals the chance to see themselves reflected positively in society. This hinders their healthy development and self-acceptance.

The Legal Arguments in Detail

The legal action initiated by the EU's executive body concerning Hungary argues that the 2021 law violates several EU directives. These include the E-Commerce Directive, the Services Directive, and the Audiovisual Media Services Directive. It does so by imposing unjustified restrictions on service provision. Furthermore, the Commission argues the law breaches the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Beyond secondary legislation, the core of the argument rests on violations of essential entitlements stipulated by the EU's foundational document. These include the liberty of self-expression, the right to non-discrimination, and the right to human dignity. The Commission also asserts a breach of Article 2 TEU, concerning the EU's core values.

Hungary's Defiance and Future Outlook

Despite significant pressure, the administration in Budapest displays little sign of backing down. Minister Balázs Hankó’s recent statements reiterate a commitment to fighting for their vision of family and child protection, regardless of international criticism. The continued passage of restrictive legislation, including constitutional amendments, underscores this defiance. The upcoming ECJ ruling will be a critical juncture. A judgment against Hungary could intensify the standoff. This could potentially lead to further EU financial sanctions or escalate the Article 7 process. Conversely, a ruling that favours Hungary, though unlikely given the Advocate General's opinion, would be a significant blow to EU efforts to enforce its values.

Global Context of LGBTQ+ Rights

The developments in Hungary occur within a complex global landscape for LGBTQ+ rights. While many Western nations have seen progress in LGBTQ+ equality, other regions are witnessing rollbacks or entrenched discrimination. The influence of socially conservative movements is evident in various countries. The use of LGBTQ+ issues as political wedge topics is also apparent. The comparison of Hungary's law to Russia's highlights a shared tactic. This tactic involves using "child protection" rhetoric to justify discriminatory policies. The EU's response to Hungary is therefore watched closely. This is not only within Europe but globally. It serves as a test of a major democratic bloc's commitment to human rights in the face of internal challenges.