SeaCURE Carbon Removal Trials Begin

Weymouth Site Tests Groundbreaking Seawater Carbon Dioxide Removal 

Along England's southern coastline, a notable project addressing climate change has commenced. SeaCURE, an experimental pilot initiative, is now operational, evaluating an original technique for taking carbon dioxide (CO2) directly from ocean water. This venture garners significant support from the UK government, which is investigating multiple technologies intended to lessen the intensifying climate emergency. An initial £3 million grant originated from the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) via its Net Zero Innovation Portfolio. This support was allocated from a broader £100 million fund revealed in 2020 targeting the advancement of Direct Air Capture (DAC) along with Greenhouse Gas Removal (GGR) capabilities within the United Kingdom. An overwhelming consensus exists among climate scientists: drastically cutting ongoing greenhouse gas output, the principal driver of global warming, must be the foremost objective. Numerous experts also highlight the critical importance of eliminating legacy emissions already residing within the atmosphere and oceans. Reaching net-zero emissions, a vital goal for stopping additional warming, likely depends on effective carbon removal approaches working alongside decarbonisation measures. 

SeaCURE’s Distinct Ocean-Centred Method 

Traditionally, most carbon capture ventures concentrate on trapping CO2 discharges at industrial locations or extracting the gas straight from surrounding air. SeaCURE explores an alternative avenue, assessing the effectiveness of CO2 removal from the sea. This strategy capitalises on a fundamental natural characteristic: seawater holds dissolved carbon at concentrations roughly 150 times greater than CO2 levels in the atmosphere. Such elevated concentration potentially allows ocean-based extraction to be more effective for each unit volume processed when compared against Direct Air Capture. The University of Exeter leads the SeaCURE undertaking, collaborating with Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML), Brunel University London, plus industry associate Eliquo Hydrok; it signifies a pioneering move towards exploring this possibility. Weymouth's pilot facility launch represents a key step in assessing this technology within an actual marine setting. 

Image Credit - BBC

Weymouth: An Advantageous Coastal Base 

The strategic positioning of the SeaCURE pilot facility is in Weymouth, Dorset. Located adjacent to the Weymouth SEA LIFE Centre, the plant accesses seawater using a purpose-built pipeline running beneath the stony coast into the English Channel. This arrangement provides researchers with uninterrupted supply of their essential input – seawater containing abundant dissolved carbon. The objective is straightforward: ascertain the economic feasibility and potential for expansion of reducing atmospheric CO2 via oceanic removal. Following processing, the treated seawater, now having a reduced carbon content, flows back into the ocean. The underlying concept is that this lower-carbon water will subsequently draw more CO2 naturally from the air, incrementally helping lower overall greenhouse gas concentrations. The Weymouth location offers a functional proving ground for this complete sequence, from water intake through to discharge. 

The Scientific Process: Extracting Carbon via SeaCURE 

SeaCURE's central technique incorporates several precisely managed stages. Professor Tom Bell of Plymouth Marine Laboratory details the first step: increasing the acidity within a segment of the incoming seawater. This chemical alteration aids the transformation of dissolved carbon forms (like bicarbonate ions) into CO2 gas. Making the carbon gaseous is vital because it simplifies separation from the water. The project utilises electrochemical processes for this pH adjustment, employing electricity – ideally from sustainable generation – to divide seawater into acidic and basic flows without introducing external chemicals. This method bolsters the process's environmental soundness. The liberated CO2 gas is then prepared for the subsequent phase: capture and concentration. 

Image Credit - BBC

Within the "Seawater Stripper" Unit 

A crucial element within the SeaCURE apparatus is informally known as the "seawater stripper." Professor Bell portrays this as a large container made from polished metallic material. Its main purpose involves maximising the interface between the acidified ocean water and air, thereby promoting swift release of the CO2, now in gaseous form. He uses the comparison of opening a carbonated beverage container; the CO2 rapidly diffuses when pressure drops and the liquid meets the air. Analogously, the stripper's configuration aids efficient "degassing" of CO2 from the manipulated seawater. This stage is essential for isolating the targeted carbon prior to its permanent extraction from the ocean-air system. The stripping process's efficiency greatly influences the SeaCURE method's overall success. 

Capturing and Densifying CO2 

After the gaseous CO2 separates from the seawater inside the stripper, the following task involves capturing and concentrating it effectively. SeaCURE utilises a technique based on charred coconut husks, a type of activated carbon. Activated carbon features a highly porous composition providing a huge internal surface area, making it highly effective for adsorbing (binding) gas molecules such as CO2. The released CO2 flow travels through this substance, which efficiently secures the carbon. This procedure concentrates the CO2, isolating it from other gases and conditioning it for potential long-term storage or future use. Employing a widely available substance like coconut remnants highlights the project's aim for potentially sustainable and economical solutions, though consideration of the long-term supply chain and material processing would be necessary for extensive implementation. 

Image Credit - BBC

Returning Manipulated Water to the Marine Setting 

Subsequent to CO2 removal, the processed seawater, now acidic and carbon-depleted, needs additional conditioning before release. Technicians introduce an alkaline substance to the water, essentially counteracting the initial acidification. This re-alkalisation stage guarantees the water sent back to the ocean is chemically balanced and presents no harm to marine life. Project documentation states the discharged water's pH adheres to UK drinking water specifications, demonstrating attention to minimising immediate chemical effects. This treated, lower-carbon water subsequently returns to the English Channel through an outlet pipe. Once back in the sea, it recommences absorbing atmospheric CO2, intended to contribute towards a net decrease in atmospheric greenhouse gases. This action concludes the SeaCURE operational loop. 

Ocean Versus Air: The Logic Behind Targeting Seawater 

Choosing seawater over air as the medium for carbon extraction arises from fundamental chemistry. Paul Halloran, SeaCURE's project director, along with others involved, stresses that the ocean naturally contains a substantially greater carbon concentration than the atmosphere – approximately 150 times higher per volume unit. This enormous disparity suggests, in theory, that CO2 extraction from seawater might be more efficient compared to Direct Air Capture, demanding less energy for processing an equivalent carbon amount. The ocean already functions as an immense carbon repository, absorbing roughly one-fourth of human-produced CO2 output each year. SeaCURE and comparable Direct Ocean Capture (DOC) technologies strive to augment this natural mechanism, essentially "squeezing the sponge" enabling the ocean to absorb additional atmospheric CO2. 

Difficulties Associated with Ocean Carbon Extraction 

Despite the benefit derived from higher carbon concentration, removing CO2 from seawater introduces distinct and considerable difficulties. A primary obstacle involves the substantial energy needed for pumping and treating vast quantities of seawater. Although proponents intend to utilize renewable energy supplies, the sheer magnitude of energy required for globally meaningful carbon removal remains a significant factor. Additionally, the marine setting itself creates problems, including possible equipment corrosion and the necessity to manage biofouling (the build-up of sea organisms on underwater equipment). Generally, DOC technologies like SeaCURE are viewed as less developed compared to DAC, necessitating further research and advancement to overcome these technical and logistical barriers before widespread implementation becomes practical. 

Pilot Operation Versus Gigatonne Scale Ambitions 

At present, the SeaCURE pilot facility at Weymouth functions at a modest level. Processing around 3,000 litres of seawater each minute, it targets removing up to 100 tonnes of CO2 yearly. This quantity is comparable to the emissions from one transatlantic commercial aeroplane journey – a minuscule proportion of worldwide emissions. The initiative's supporters envision vast potential should the technology prove scalable successfully and environmentally benign. Proposals submitted to the UK government indicate that processing merely one percent of the global surface ocean could hypothetically extract an astonishing fourteen billion tonnes of CO2 annually. Achieving such potential depends crucially on surmounting the energy hurdle and guaranteeing the whole operation utilizes renewable power. 

Image Credit - BBC

Envisioning Future Scale-Up 

Attaining the enormous scale imagined for ocean carbon extraction demands major innovation, especially concerning energy provision. One idea proposes deploying large, self-operating carbon removal installations offshore. Such platforms could potentially utilize abundant offshore renewable energy supplies, like solar or wind generation, bypassing grid connections and land-use competition. Incorporating DOC systems with current marine facilities, such as desalination operations or perhaps retired oil platforms, represents another path under investigation by firms including Captura. The ultimate aim involves creating systems that are not just potent carbon removers but also energy-sparing, economical, and ecologically safe, permitting deployment at a magnitude appropriate for the climate threat. 

The Wider View of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) 

SeaCURE forms part of expanding worldwide attention towards Carbon Dioxide Removal technologies. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stresses that reducing current emissions alone is unlikely sufficient for meeting Paris Agreement objectives, like restricting warming below 1.5°C. Eliminating historical CO2 from the atmosphere – generating "negative emissions" – is increasingly regarded as vital. Oliver Geden, an IPCC contributor specializing in carbon capture, emphasizes carbon removal's necessity for reaching net-zero emissions. Ocean-based extraction is merely one classification among approximately twenty potential CDR strategies under global investigation. Alternative techniques encompass DAC, bioenergy combined with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), enhanced rock decomposition, tree planting, plus various farming methods. The eventual choice and application of these approaches will strongly depend on demonstrated effectiveness, scalability, expense, storage permanence, and environmental safety. 

Governmental Backing for Greenhouse Gas Removal (GGR) 

The UK administration actively promotes GGR technology advancement through programs like the Net Zero Innovation Portfolio. SeaCURE obtained its £3 million financing within the Direct Air Capture & Greenhouse Gas Removal Innovation Programme, which initially supported 15 pilot ventures investigating diverse GGR techniques. This program, initiated in 2020 with funding up to £100 million, sought to hasten the development and proving of these essential technologies. Although that specific DAC & GGR Innovation Programme has concluded, the government persists in formulating policies, including business models structured around 'contracts for difference', designed to draw private funding and facilitate the expansion of engineered removal methods. The UK has established ambitious goals, targeting a minimum of 5 million tonnes of engineered removals annually by 2030, potentially increasing substantially by 2035 and 2050. 

Economic Potential and Green Advancement 

Beyond the principal climate mitigation purpose, initiatives such as SeaCURE are perceived as catalysts for green advancement and economic expansion. Energy Secretary Kerry McCarthy underscored carbon removal's essential function in fulfilling net-zero ambitions. She highlighted the significance of SeaCURE along with comparable research undertakings, for instance, those at the University of Exeter, in cultivating environmentally beneficial technologies. GGR technology development and application are anticipated to generate high-calibre job opportunities throughout the UK, especially within engineering, environmental science, and manufacturing domains. Establishing the UK as a frontrunner in this developing sector could also yield considerable export prospects for British firms engaged in creating and implementing these novel climate approaches. 

Image Credit - BBC

Considering Potential Environmental Consequences 

Although the idea of removing surplus CO2 is attractive, modifying ocean chemistry extensively carries possible environmental hazards demanding thorough evaluation. Releasing huge volumes of low-carbon, potentially pH-altered seawater back into the ocean might affect marine ecosystems. At Weymouth's current pilot magnitude, the quantity discharged via the outflow structure is minimal and improbable to trigger significant local disturbances. Scaling substantially necessitates comprehensive understanding of potential repercussions. Researchers are actively probing these effects. The project group monitors water quality continuously to ensure adherence to regulations established by the Environment Agency, aiming for discharged water pH levels within acceptable parameters. 

Studying Effects on Marine Organisms 

Investigators like Guy Hooper, pursuing doctoral studies at the University of Exeter, are specifically examining the environmental outcomes of SeaCURE's operation. His research entails exposing different marine types to the low-carbon water within controlled lab conditions. Marine organisms, ranging from microscopic phytoplankton (forming the foundation of many marine food chains) to shellfish such as molluscs, rely on dissolved carbon substances for crucial life functions. Phytoplankton utilize it during photosynthesis (for energy creation), whereas molluscs integrate it into their shells and skeletons (a process called calcification). Hooper observes that a massive surge in releasing low-carbon seawater could potentially interfere with these basic processes and affect marine environments. Early detection of such risks enables proactive creation of mitigation approaches, like pre-mixing the discharged water, ensuring environmental protection remains central as the technology advances. 

Cost-Efficiency: The Critical Determinant 

Ultimately, broad implementation of any CDR technology will depend upon its cost-efficiency relative to alternative options. While DOC advocates emphasize potential cost advantages over DAC owing to higher CO2 concentration in seawater, achieving this potential presents difficulties. Current DAC expenses are projected between $630 per CO2 tonne, although reductions are anticipated with technological progress and larger production scales. Certain DOC startups, like Brineworks, target costs under $100 per tonne when scaled, potentially improving competitiveness. DOC cost estimates fluctuate, and some studies propose standalone facilities might initially be considerably pricier than DAC. SeaCURE's pilot stage is vital for collecting real-world information regarding operating expenses and energy use, aiding refinement of these economic analyses and establishing the technology's genuine financial practicality. 

The Significance of Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) 

A crucial requirement for any CDR technique, including ocean-based strategies, involves dependable Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification. Accurately quantifying the precise amount of CO2 removed from the atmosphere and its storage duration is essential, ensuring the climate advantage is genuine and lasting. For ocean CDR, this requires tracking alterations in water chemistry, observing the destination of the returned low-carbon water, and evaluating possible leakage from storage locations if CO2 is captured then sequestered geologically. Creating trustworthy, standardized MRV procedures is vital for fostering confidence in these technologies, facilitating involvement in carbon markets, and guaranteeing environmental safeguards are upheld. Research initiatives, including Exeter projects focused on seaweed sinking, are formulating frameworks for effective MRV within challenging marine settings. 

A Diverse Range of Ocean CDR Methods 

SeaCURE's electrochemical technique represents just one among multiple strategies under investigation for ocean-based CDR. Other notable approaches encompass Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE), involving adding alkaline minerals into seawater to chemically boost its CO2 absorption and storage potential as bicarbonate, possibly simultaneously mitigating ocean acidification. Nutrient fertilization (using iron or other elements) aims to trigger phytoplankton growth spurts that absorb CO2, although storage permanence and ecological side-effects pose major concerns. Cultivating macroalgae (seaweed), then sinking the harvested biomass deep into the ocean, constitutes another strategy. Artificial upwelling/downwelling attempts manipulating ocean currents for enhanced carbon absorption or deep-sea carbon transport. Each approach presents unique possibilities, challenges, and environmental implications, highlighting the necessity for a varied research effort. 

Ethical Dimensions and Societal Acceptance 

Separate from technical and environmental hurdles, extensive deployment of ocean CDR technologies prompts significant ethical considerations and demands thoughtful attention to societal acceptance. Modifying the ocean, a globally shared resource, necessitates international collaboration alongside governance structures. Potential effects on coastal populations, fishing industries, and marine biodiversity require transparent evaluation and resolution. Public viewpoint and consent are critical. Ensuring equitable distribution of benefits and risks, alongside inclusive decision-making processes informed by sound science, will be essential for responsible advancement and potential application of these potent, yet possibly disruptive, technologies. Establishing definite criteria for scientific validity, environmental soundness, and societal impact, as pursued by initiatives involving firms like Microsoft and Carbon Direct, represents progress in this area. 

Conclusion: A Deliberate Way Forward 

Weymouth's SeaCURE project signifies an important, though preliminary, phase in assessing the potential for CO2 removal from seawater. While the prospect of utilizing the ocean's immense carbon absorption capability holds strong appeal, considerable obstacles persist. Technical difficulties concerning energy usage and scalability require resolution. Strict environmental evaluation is essential to guarantee solutions avoid generating fresh issues for marine ecosystems. Cost-efficiency will ultimately govern viability compared against other climate strategies. Reducing greenhouse gas output remains the most pressing climate imperative. As the requirement for carbon dioxide removal grows more evident, initiatives like SeaCURE offer indispensable real-world information and practical insights, guiding the careful yet vital investigation of every potential instrument available in combating climate change. Progressing from pilot facility to global solution demands ongoing innovation, critical assessment, and steadfast dedication to environmental protection.