Quick Commerce India Closes Shops

Delivered in minutes, closing for decades: Quick commerce disrupts India's local retail

Ramji Dharod’s small grocery shop sits quietly on a Mumbai side street. For over six decades, it served the local community. Now, it stands on the verge of closing permanently. The shop itself has been a neighbourhood fixture for 75 years, a testament to a different era of commerce. Dharod started working there alongside his father when he was just ten years old. Today, his days pass slowly inside the shop. He waits patiently for customers who rarely arrive. Behind him, unsold goods pile up, marked for clearance. A deep inventory reduction is underway, signalling the end.

The decline starkly contrasts with the shop’s vibrant past. Dharod, now in his seventies, recalls a time when business never stopped. "Years prior, there was never a respite," he notes with irony. The current reality involves minimal foot traffic. He observes that online shopping has become ubiquitous. This shift prompted his decision to retire and close the business. His story reflects a wider trend affecting countless small retailers across India’s urban landscapes. The convenience of digital ordering has reshaped consumer habits, leaving many traditional shops struggling to survive in this new retail environment.

Image Credit - Freepik

Rapid Delivery Rises, Revenue Falls

The rapid expansion of quick delivery services coincides with numerous closures of local shops. Apps like Zepto, Blinkit, and Swiggy Instamart promise groceries within minutes. This convenience proves irresistible for many city dwellers. A national organisation representing goods wholesalers reported a staggering 200,000 similar shop closures last October alone. In Chennai, city authorities documented a significant decline over the past five years. Small markets saw a 20% reduction, while larger retail locations decreased by 30%. These figures highlight the immense pressure traditional retailers face from their new digital competitors.

Sunil Kenia runs a shop near Dharod’s. He believes owning the shop premises is the only reason his business still operates. Many others renting their spaces cannot afford to continue. Kenia explained the downturn began after Covid-19 restrictions eased. Current revenue sits at roughly half the pre-pandemic levels. He stated that most of his income now comes from supplying bulk items to street vendors. Direct customer sales have almost completely disappeared. The ease of using mobile delivery apps primarily drives this dramatic shift in purchasing behaviour.

Convenience Trumps Tradition

Monisha Sathe, a media professional living in Mumbai, represents many Indians who changed their shopping habits. She stopped making regular trips to local markets. The sheer convenience of rapid delivery apps swayed her decision. Sathe found transporting purchases burdensome. Driving often meant navigating heavy traffic and struggling to find parking spaces. While she misses the personal interaction with shopkeepers and the wide variety of goods readily available in traditional markets, the ease offered by delivery apps wins out. The streamlined process significantly simplifies daily life for busy urban residents like her.

Recent survey data from PwC supports this view. Nearly half the residents in major Indian cities share Sathe’s preference. They particularly favour swift delivery for emergency purchases or essential top-ups. This change in how people buy goods directly impacts sellers. Nearly one-third of retailers reported a negative effect on their revenue. Staple product sales saw a particularly sharp fall, dropping by 52%. The lure of speed and convenience is fundamentally altering the grocery retail landscape, pushing traditional models towards a critical juncture. Consumers increasingly prioritise time saving over traditional shopping experiences.

Merchants Demand Intervention

The image of shuttered shops and declining revenues paints a stark picture. Traditional retailers see a direct threat from the burgeoning quick commerce sector. Merchant groups representing thousands of small businesses have repeatedly voiced their anxieties. They urge the government to intervene and regulate the rapid expansion of online delivery platforms. These organisations fear the very fabric of local commerce is unravelling. They argue that the current trajectory unfairly disadvantages long-standing neighbourhood stores. The core concern revolves around the competitive tactics employed by heavily funded tech companies.

These established trade bodies feel the playing field is uneven. They accuse quick commerce giants of engaging in practices that undermine fair competition. Specifically, accusations include using vast sums of venture capital to undercut prices significantly. Deep discounting and subsidies make it nearly impossible for small shops, operating on thinner margins, to compete effectively. This pricing strategy, critics argue, aims to capture market share rapidly, regardless of immediate profitability, squeezing out smaller players. The calls for government action seek measures to ensure fair trade practices and protect the livelihoods dependent on traditional retail.

Image Credit - Freepik

Gauging the Real Threat

But how profoundly do these on-demand shopping platforms genuinely threaten India's vast network of local shops? Ankur Bisen, a senior partner at Technopak Advisors, offers a nuanced perspective. He acknowledges that traditional retail outlets, from corner kiranas to larger supermarkets, undoubtedly face intensified competition. The pressure is real and growing. However, Bisen also emphasizes the current limitations of the instant delivery model's reach. Its dominance remains largely confined to a handful of major metropolitan areas. The vast majority of India's retail landscape operates outside this intense zone of competition.

Bisen points out that quick commerce revenue originates almost entirely within India's top three or four densely populated cities. Its success hinges on specific urban demographics and infrastructure. Unlike global trends where quick commerce might have broader penetration, India's market flourishes primarily due to concentrated populations within these specific urban hubs. This concentration allows for the operational efficiencies needed to make 10-minute deliveries viable. Outside these areas, the economic and logistical challenges increase significantly, limiting the immediate widespread threat to all neighbourhood stores across the country.

The Urban Advantage and Dark Stores

The success of instant grocery delivery in India relies heavily on the unique characteristics of its major cities. High population density allows companies to serve many customers within a small radius. This concentration underpins the 'dark store' model. These are essentially small, strategically located warehouses, closed to the public, stocking a curated range of high-demand items. Deliveries dispatch directly from these hubs. This system enables rapid fulfilment and achieves cost benefits through bulk purchasing and streamlined logistics. Companies like Zepto, Blinkit (owned by Zomato), and Swiggy Instamart operate extensive networks of these dark stores.

Expanding this model beyond major urban centres presents significant hurdles, according to Bisen. Less predictable purchasing patterns and scattered populations in smaller towns and rural areas make rapid delivery economically challenging. The logistics become more complex and costly. Maintaining a network of dark stores and ensuring speedy delivery across wider geographical areas requires substantial investment with uncertain returns. Therefore, while quick commerce disrupts urban markets profoundly, its expansion into Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities faces considerable obstacles related to profitability and operational scalability. The unique urban ecosystem is key to its current success.

Projected Growth Fuels Anxiety

Despite the current geographical limitations, the future trajectory of quick commerce causes significant unease among traditional retailers. Consumer purchasing choices, even if initially limited to specific areas, inevitably reshape the broader market over time. Analysts predict substantial expansion for the instant delivery sector. Bain & Company estimates that India's quick commerce market will grow by over 40% annually until 2030. This rapid growth trajectory relies on increased market penetration into new cities and neighbourhoods. As these services become available to more consumers, the pressure on established businesses will intensify across a wider area.

This projected expansion worries established commerce operators. Industry consortiums, representing millions of merchants, watch this development closely. The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) and the All India Consumer Products Distributors Federation (AICPDF) claim to speak for over 13 million businesses. These groups have issued several strongly worded public statements. Their appeals target lawmakers, highlighting the potential disruption caused by the sector's unchecked, rapid growth. They fear a future where local shops struggle even more profoundly against digitally native competitors armed with significant capital and aggressive expansion strategies. The long-term viability of traditional retail models seems increasingly uncertain.

Image Credit - Freepik

Accusations of Predatory Tactics

The core complaint from trade bodies centres on alleged unfair competitive practices. They accuse quick commerce giants of leveraging enormous amounts of venture capital funding irresponsibly. These funds, argue the associations, allow platforms to engage in deep discounting and offer heavy subsidies on goods. This strategy deliberately undercuts the prices offered by traditional marketplaces and smaller shops. Such tactics, critics claim, distort the market and create an environment where fair economic exchange becomes impossible. Smaller retailers, operating without such massive financial backing, simply cannot match these artificially low prices, leading to a loss of customers and revenue.

The BBC's reporting included conversations with various small vendors who echoed these concerns. Their firsthand experiences align with the allegations made by the larger trade organisations. Ankur Bisen from Technopak also confirmed there is substance to these claims, particularly regarding the impact within the operational "clusters" or zones surrounding the dark stores used by quick commerce companies. The concentrated nature of quick commerce operations appears to amplify their competitive impact within specific localities, validating the concerns raised by traditional retailers about predatory pricing strategies funded by external investment rather than operational efficiency alone. Fair competition principles seem threatened.

Industry Silence and Counterarguments

Attempts to get direct responses from the major players in the quick commerce industry proved challenging. The BBC reached out to Swiggy, Blinkit, and Zepto for clarification regarding the allegations of unfair practices. These leading companies reportedly declined opportunities to comment directly on the specific claims made by merchant associations and individual shopkeepers. This silence fuels further suspicion among critics. However, information emerged from sources within these rapid delivery services, offering a different perspective. These insiders provided details suggesting a more complex picture than simple platform-funded discounts.

According to these sources speaking to the BBC, the discounts offered to consumers often originate from the brands or sellers using the platform, not solely from the quick commerce company itself. Manufacturers and distributors sometimes fund promotions to boost sales volume through this rapidly growing channel. This perspective attempts to counter the narrative of big tech crushing small businesses through unsustainable pricing. It suggests a collaborative promotional effort rather than a purely predatory one. An additional argument highlights the value quick commerce provides, addressing genuine consumer pain points related to the inconvenience of traditional shopping, especially for certain demographics.

Image Credit - Freepik

Addressing Consumer Needs

Beyond the polarised view pitting large corporations against small family businesses, proponents of quick commerce highlight genuine problems solved. One source stressed that these platforms address tangible issues. Traditional shopping experiences often presented significant difficulties for consumers needing essential items quickly. Getting groceries involved travel, time, and often, inconvenience. This burden falls particularly heavily on certain groups. Women managing households and elderly individuals often find trips to crowded markets physically demanding or time-consuming. Quick delivery removes these hurdles, offering a practical solution for obtaining necessary goods without hassle.

Furthermore, the argument extends to market access for smaller players. Quick commerce platforms potentially offer visibility to smaller sellers or brands. These smaller entities might otherwise struggle to secure shelf space in traditional physical stores. Established retail often prioritizes well-known, high-volume brands. Digital marketplaces, proponents claim, can level the playing field somewhat. They provide an alternative channel for lesser-known products to reach consumers directly. This perspective frames quick commerce not just as a convenience machine, but as a force potentially democratising the consumer marketplace. It offers choice and access previously unavailable through conventional channels alone.

The Prospect of Coexistence

Despite the clear disruptions and varying stages of market development, business analysts suggest a future of coexistence. Different retail formats – the local neighbourhood shop, larger supermarkets, and instant delivery providers – could potentially find ways to operate successfully alongside each other within India's vast and diverse marketplace. Ankur Bisen supports this view, pointing to historical precedent. The Indian retail landscape has absorbed previous waves of change without eliminating older models entirely. A complete takeover by any single format appears unlikely given the country's complex consumer base and geographical spread.

This potential for synergy echoes earlier predictions surrounding e-commerce. When platforms like Flipkart and Amazon gained prominence around 2010, many forecasted disaster for local stores. Widespread closures seemed inevitable as online shopping offered unprecedented variety and home delivery. Pundits painted a bleak future for traditional brick-and-mortar retail. However, the reality proved more complex. While e-commerce certainly grew and carved out a significant market share, it did not obliterate the neighbourhood shop as predicted. This history suggests resilience within the traditional sector and a capacity for multiple retail models to serve different consumer needs simultaneously.

Image Credit - Freepik

Lessons from the E-commerce Wave

Reflecting on the past decade provides valuable context. Over thirteen years have passed since those initial dire prophecies about e-commerce's impact. Yet, physical stores remain dominant. Current estimates suggest only around 4-6% of total Indian retail transactions actually occur on digital e-commerce platforms. This figure, while growing, demonstrates the enduring importance of physical retail. Local shops retained customer loyalty through factors like proximity, personal relationships, credit facilities, and catering to immediate, small-ticket needs. The predicted retail apocalypse failed to fully materialise.

Market experts believe this history holds lessons for the current quick commerce challenge. It suggests that while disruptive, new models do not automatically erase existing ones. Indian consumers exhibit diverse shopping behaviours. They utilise different channels for different needs. Quick commerce excels at speed and convenience for urgent, limited purchases. Traditional stores offer wider selection, personal service, and serve broader shopping missions. This differentiation allows for market segmentation. Experts argue that local stores, rather than facing inevitable extinction, need to adapt strategically to remain relevant in this evolving ecosystem, just as they adapted to the rise of general e-commerce.

Adapting to Survive

Market experts propose a proactive response from traditional neighbourhood stores. Instead of passively resisting change, local retailers should actively adapt their strategies. Updating promotional tactics represents a crucial first step. Shops can leverage their community presence through localised marketing efforts. Incorporating digital methods offers another pathway to competitiveness. This does not necessarily mean building complex independent apps. Simpler solutions exist, such as using WhatsApp for orders or partnering with hyperlocal delivery services that focus on existing stores rather than dark stores. Embracing technology can enhance convenience for customers.

The goal involves creating a hybrid model. Local shops can blend their traditional strengths – personal service, trust, community knowledge – with modern digital convenience. Combining online ordering options with the familiar local presence could augment the customer experience significantly. This approach offers the best of both worlds: the ease of digital interaction coupled with the reliability and personal touch of the neighbourhood kirana. Such integration could help retain existing customers and potentially attract new ones seeking a balance between speed and familiarity. Survival hinges on evolution, not stagnation, within the retail sphere.

Image Credit - Freepik

The Digital Imperative

For many local retail providers, some operating for multiple decades, clinging to outdated business strategies spells trouble. Maintaining the status quo, with virtually no innovative adjustments, proves increasingly untenable. Customer expectations have shifted dramatically. The rise of quick commerce platforms has conditioned consumers, particularly in urban areas, to expect near-instant gratification. Waiting days, or even hours, for essential items feels less acceptable now. Businesses failing to recognise and respond to this fundamental shift risk becoming obsolete. The convenience benchmark has been permanently raised by digital competitors.

Innovation is no longer optional; it is essential. This might involve rethinking inventory management to focus on high-demand items suitable for quick local delivery. It could mean improving store layout for faster picking if offering local delivery. Exploring partnerships with local delivery startups presents another avenue. Even simple digital payment options enhance the customer experience. The key lies in acknowledging that the competitive landscape has fundamentally changed. Relying solely on tradition and location advantages will likely fail against services offering unprecedented speed and ease of purchase. Proactive adaptation is the required response.

An Evolving Retail Landscape

The tension between India's established local shops and the burgeoning quick commerce sector continues to unfold. While analysts suggest potential for coexistence, the path forward remains uncertain. The rapid growth projections for instant delivery guarantee continued pressure on traditional retailers. Government intervention, frequently requested by merchant associations, could alter the competitive dynamics significantly. Regulations addressing pricing strategies, dark store operations, or labour practices within the gig economy could level the playing field or introduce new complexities. The ultimate balance between these different retail models is still taking shape.

India’s retail future likely involves a mosaic of formats serving diverse consumer needs. The enduring strengths of neighbourhood stores – trust, credit, personal relationships, deep community integration – remain valuable assets. Quick commerce offers undeniable speed and convenience, particularly for time-pressed urban consumers. Larger supermarkets provide extensive product range and one-stop shopping experiences. Success for each format may depend on understanding specific customer segments and leveraging unique advantages. For neighbourhood shops like Ramji Dharod's, sadly facing closure, the pace of change proved too swift. For others, embracing adaptation and integrating digital tools may offer a path to continued relevance in India's dynamic marketplace.