Poland Considers Nuclear Arms After Ottawa Exit

Poland Accelerates Defence Preparedness in Response to Eastern Threats

In a sweeping address to the Sejm on Friday, Prime Minister Donald Tusk unveiled an ambitious plan to overhaul Poland’s military readiness. With Russia’s relentless assault on Ukraine intensifying, Tusk emphasised the urgent need to train every adult male for potential conflict. Meanwhile, the government aims to expand its active military personnel from 220,000 to 500,000, incorporating reservists into a Swiss-inspired model. Notably, Poland already allocates 4.1% of its GDP to defence—the highest among NATO members—and plans to raise this to 4.7% in 2024.

The proposal arrives amid escalating anxieties across Europe. For context, Russia launched over 3,000 missiles and drones at Ukrainian energy infrastructure in March 2024 alone, according to Kyiv’s armed forces. Consequently, Tusk argued that Poland’s geographic position—sharing a 332-mile border with Ukraine and Kaliningrad—demands unprecedented vigilance. “We must prepare for scenarios where our sovereignty faces direct threats,” he stated, referencing Warsaw’s historical struggles under Russian domination during the 19th century and Cold War.

A Reserve Force Rooted in Swiss Precedent

Rather than reinstating compulsory conscription, Tusk’s strategy mirrors Switzerland’s reserve system. In the Alpine nation, men aged 18–34 undergo 18 weeks of basic training, followed by annual refreshers until age 50. Similarly, Poland’s programme would mandate military education for adult males while allowing women to volunteer. By December 2024, officials aim to finalise a framework ensuring “every citizen understands their role in national defence,” Tusk added.

Critics, however, question the feasibility of such rapid expansion. Currently, Poland’s armed forces include 200,000 active personnel, with plans to reach 300,000 by 2025. Doubling this figure within a few years would require significant investment. Defence analyst Marek Świerczyński estimates the initiative could cost £6.7bn annually, factoring in equipment, salaries, and infrastructure. Still, Tusk remains undeterred: “Security isn’t a line item; it’s the foundation of our freedom.”

Nuclear Ambitions and Treaty Withdrawals Stir Debate

In a contentious move, Tusk also endorsed exploring nuclear energy for military purposes. While Poland lacks atomic weapons, the PM hinted at partnerships with NATO allies to modernise its arsenal. Simultaneously, he advocated withdrawing from the 1997 Ottawa Convention, which bans landmines, and the 2008 Dublin Agreement on cluster munitions. These treaties, he argued, hinder Poland’s ability to counter adversaries who “freely use such tools.”

Lithuania and Finland—both NATO members bordering Russia—have echoed similar sentiments. For instance, Helsinki announced in January 2024 that it might exit the Ottawa Treaty, citing “asymmetric threats” from Moscow. Meanwhile, Jarosław Kaczyński, leader of the opposition Law and Justice party, called for a societal “mental shift” toward  militarisation. “Men must embrace the ethos of sacrifice,” he declared, sparking backlash from gender equality advocates.

Trump’s NATO Skepticism Fuels European Unease

The geopolitical landscape grew more volatile after former US President Donald Trump hinted at conditional support for NATO. During a February 2024 rally, Trump claimed he would “encourage Russia to act freely” against allies failing to meet defence spending targets. Although he later condemned Moscow’s strikes on Ukrainian power plants, European leaders remain wary. Tusk warned that a Ukrainian defeat would leave Poland “exposed to Kremlin aggression,” a view shared by Baltic states.

President Andrzej Duda, aligning with Tusk’s urgency, proposed a constitutional amendment locking defence spending at 4% of GDP. With cross-party support, the measure could pass by late 2024. Yet economists caution that sustained high expenditure might strain public services. For perspective, Poland’s 2023 defence budget topped £23bn, exceeding healthcare (£18bn) and education (£15bn) combined.

Public Reaction: Patriotism Meets Pragmatism

Reactions to Tusk’s announcements vary widely. In Warsaw, 54-year-old teacher Marek Nowak praised the plan as “necessary for deterrence,” while Gdansk student Lena Kowalska criticised its gender exclusivity: “Why train only men? Women defended Ukraine too.” Meanwhile, farmers’ unions worry expanded military infrastructure could encroach on arable land—a sensitive issue amid ongoing protests over EU climate policies.

Historians, however, note parallels to the interwar period when Poland rebuilt its army after WWI. Professor Anna Zielińska of Jagiellonian University remarked, “The nation has always risen to existential challenges, but unity is key.” As debates rage, one fact remains clear: Poland’s security strategy will shape not only its future but Europe’s collective defence posture.

Strategic Shifts and Societal Implications of Poland’s Defence Overhaul

As Poland pushes forward with its military expansion, parallels to past conflicts loom large. The country’s eastern regions, once part of the Russian Empire and later under Soviet influence, now face renewed geopolitical pressure. In response, Tusk’s government has prioritised rapid militarisation, drawing comparisons to the 1920s when Marshal Józef Piłsudski fortified the nation against Bolshevik incursions. Today, however, the stakes involve advanced technology and hybrid warfare. For example, Russia’s deployment of AI-driven drones in Ukraine has prompted Warsaw to invest £1.2bn in counter-drone systems by 2026.

The timing of these measures coincides with shifting US priorities. Since Donald Trump’s return to the White House in January 2025, American military aid to Ukraine has dropped by 78%, according to Pentagon data. Meanwhile, Trump’s suggestion that NATO members “pay their dues or face consequences” has left European capitals scrambling. Poland, already exceeding NATO’s 2% GDP defence target, now seeks to insulate itself from Washington’s unpredictability. “We cannot outsource our security,” Defence Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz asserted during a March 2025 press briefing.

Image Credit - NBC

Logistical Hurdles and Recruitment Realities

Expanding the military to 500,000 personnel presents formidable challenges. Recruitment drives target urban centres like Warsaw and Kraków, but rural areas—home to 40% of Poland’s population—show reluctance. A February 2025 survey by CBOS found only 33% of rural respondents supported mandatory training, compared to 58% in cities. Compounding this, the defence ministry faces a shortage of 12,000 trained instructors, as reported by Rzeczpospolita.

To address gaps, officials propose partnerships with private firms. For instance, Polish arms manufacturer PGZ pledged to train 5,000 reservists annually at its facilities in Stalowa Wola. Similarly, tech startups specialising in cybersecurity have begun offering subsidised courses to military recruits. Yet critics argue such measures prioritise quantity over quality. “A half-million army means little without modern logistics,” warned General Rajmund Andrzejczak, former chief of the general staff.

Gender Dynamics in National Defence

Jarosław Kaczyński’s call for a “chivalric ethos” has ignited fierce debate about gender roles in the military. While the government’s plan excludes mandatory training for women, volunteer programmes have seen a 45% uptake since 2023, per defence ministry figures. Lieutenant Anna Maria Wesołowska, a veteran of Poland’s Afghanistan deployment, criticised the policy as outdated. “In Ukraine, women make up 22% of armed forces. Why can’t we learn from their example?” she asked during a televised debate on TVN24.

The issue extends beyond symbolism. With Poland’s fertility rate at 1.33—well below the EU average of 1.53—demographers warn that excluding half the population from defence planning risks long-term sustainability. Sociologist Dr. Katarzyna Wojnicka of Jagiellonian University notes, “Militarising masculinity alone ignores how modern conflicts demand diverse skills, from cyber expertise to medical aid.”

Economic Trade-Offs and Constitutional Reforms

President Andrzej Duda’s proposal to constitutionally mandate 4% GDP defence spending has sparked concerns about fiscal trade-offs. The amendment, slated for parliamentary debate in April 2025, would legally bind future governments to  military investments. While popular among conservatives, economists highlight risks. “Locking in such high expenditure could starve healthcare and green energy projects,” argued Professor Marek Belka, former head of the National Bank of Poland.

Comparatively, Poland’s 2024 defence budget of £23bn dwarfs allocations for education (£15bn) and renewable energy (£4.5bn). Farmers, already protesting EU climate policies, fear expanded military bases could consume arable land. “We’re being asked to sacrifice livelihoods for security,” said Janusz Kowalski, leader of the AgroUnion protest group, during a rally in Poznań.

Regional Alliances and Nuclear Ambiguity

Tusk’s nod toward nuclear “possibilities” has raised eyebrows across Europe. Though Poland lacks an atomic arsenal, talks with France and the UK about shared deterrence strategies gained traction in early 2025. French President Emmanuel Macron reportedly discussed leasing tactical nuclear weapons to Warsaw during a February summit—a move Moscow called “provocative.” Simultaneously, Poland’s bid to host NATO’s new Space Centre in Szczecin underscores its ambition to diversify defence capabilities.

The potential withdrawal from the Ottawa Convention on landmines further complicates diplomatic relations. While Finland and Lithuania explore similar exits, Germany and Canada have condemned the move. “Abandoning humanitarian treaties sets a dangerous precedent,” argued Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock during a March 2025 EU council meeting. Tusk, however, remains resolute: “We cannot fight with one hand tied when adversaries use every tool available.”

Cultural Shifts and Generational Divides

The government’s militarisation push has deepened generational rifts. Younger Poles, particularly in urban areas, express scepticism about mandatory training. A March 2025 poll by Ipsos found 62% of those aged 18–34 opposed the plan, citing career disruptions and ethical concerns. Conversely, older generations, shaped by Cold War experiences, largely endorse it. “My father survived martial law in 1981. He understands why we must prepare,” said Kraków resident Piotr Nowak, 49.

Universities have become battlegrounds for this debate. At the University of Warsaw, student groups organised “Books Not Bullets” rallies, demanding increased education funding. Meanwhile, veterans’ associations tour schools to promote patriotic duty. “Security requires sacrifice, not just hashtags,” argued Major Tomasz Szatkowski during a lecture in Wrocław.

Poland’s Defence Strategy and Europe’s Shifting Security Landscape

Poland’s security overhaul unfolds against the backdrop of a lingering refugee crisis. As of February 2025, nearly one million Ukrainians remain in Poland, according to Statista, with many integrated into local communities. Meanwhile, the government faces criticism for redirecting funds from humanitarian aid to military projects. In March 2025, Warsaw slashed support for refugee housing by 30%, diverting £450m to drone defence systems. “We must prioritise survival over charity,” argued Interior Minister Marcin Kierwiński, sparking protests in cities like Lublin and Rzeszów.

The strain on resources highlights broader tensions within the EU. While Poland’s defence spending now exceeds 5% of GDP—surpassing even the US—Germany and France lag at 2.1% and 1.9% respectively. Consequently, Tusk has urged Brussels to adopt a “collective defence fund” financed by member states. “Europe’s security cannot hinge on one nation’s sacrifices,” he declared at a March 2025 EU summit, though the proposal faces resistance from fiscally conservative states.

Image Credit - NBC

Technological Arms Race and Hybrid Threats

Russia’s evolving tactics in Ukraine have forced Poland to accelerate investments in cutting-edge defence tech. In January 2025, the defence ministry signed a £880m contract with South Korea’s Hanwha Systems for AI-powered surveillance drones. Simultaneously, cyberattacks on Polish infrastructure surged by 140% year-on-year, per the National Cybersecurity Centre. “Hybrid warfare blurs the line between soldier and hacker,” noted General Tomasz Piotrowski, emphasising plans to recruit 10,000 tech specialists by 2026.

The focus on innovation extends to nuclear energy. Though Poland aims to launch its first nuclear plant by 2033, Tusk’s hints at military applications have stirred controversy. Leaked documents from a February 2025 meeting with French officials revealed discussions about joint nuclear exercises—a move critics call “reckless escalation.” Moscow responded by deploying Iskander missiles to Kaliningrad, capable of striking Warsaw within seven minutes.

Legal and Ethical Quagmires

Poland’s potential exit from the Ottawa and Dublin treaties has drawn condemnation from human rights groups. Amnesty International reported in April 2025 that Russian forces used landmines to kill over 600 Ukrainian civilians since 2022. “Abandoning these bans makes Poland complicit in future atrocities,” argued director Agnieszka Kubal. Conversely, Lithuanian Defence Minister Arvydas Anušauskas backed Warsaw’s stance: “When facing existential threats, legal niceties become luxuries.”

The ethical debate extends to conscription models. While Switzerland’s system includes civilian service options—such as  disaster response or healthcare—Poland’s draft framework lacks alternatives. “Forcing pacifists into uniform violates basic freedoms,” argued constitutional lawyer Dr. Piotr Radziewicz. Despite this, the Supreme Court upheld the policy in a landmark March 2025 ruling, citing “national emergency” provisions.

Trump’s Shadow and NATO’s Future

Donald Trump’s ambivalence toward NATO continues to reshape European alliances. After the US halted satellite intelligence sharing with Ukraine in January 2025, Poland spearheaded a regional spy satellite consortium with Estonia and Latvia. Meanwhile, Trump’s tariffs on EU steel—imposed after a March 2025 tweet accusing Europe of “freeloading”—have strained transatlantic trade. “We’re rebuilding alliances Trump shattered,” admitted Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski during a tense Brussels negotiation.

The uncertainty has revitalised calls for EU military autonomy. France and Germany announced a joint fighter jet project in April 2025, while Poland partnered with South Korea on missile defence systems. Yet disparities persist: the EU’s combined defence budget trails China’s by £180bn, according to SIPRI data. “Without unity, Europe becomes a playground for superpowers,” warned European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

Conclusion: A Nation at a Crossroads

Poland’s militarisation drive reflects both historical trauma and forward-looking pragmatism. By blending Swiss-style reserves with cutting-edge tech, Warsaw aims to deter aggression without sacrificing economic growth. However, the human costs—from gendered conscription to refugee aid cuts—reveal deep societal fractures.

As the EU grapples with its own defence identity, Poland’s strategy offers a template for smaller nations confronting existential threats. Yet the reliance on controversial tools like landmines and nuclear ambiguity risks eroding moral authority. Ultimately, the success of Tusk’s vision hinges on a precarious balance: preparing for war while preserving the very values Poland seeks to defend. In the words of dissenting MP Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus, “A fortress mentality may save borders, but it cannot build a future.”